From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B48C61DA4 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 00:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233389AbjBCAGF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 19:06:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233478AbjBCAFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 19:05:54 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DEED86EBB for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id lu11so10959599ejb.3 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:05:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ElCEgzYJT7w+JdKbabLIuYeTly0I88jzwy4ftNw2528=; b=bPzO2GfbJB2CNez7PNGdkg7AoLTlCZRmr17pX5m9Ypdq05V3vJHYsyF3LdnaKZyuaE pGckIiQCXVWHPe5uKNIbUg3v7hjITymrqsIPKsMYwEbGney4seroDS/V+OiTW4XbpgPj alPjEHIdPSsoDFdwE8OSjxHgE3kWOK+OINKuP0GyJbIBzwCsZ3JuvT+j+RX47QdN7TUv 9sQ0ZEiSVpmvJcMXl/YuBZZiqEfV8c8vMr+/GuavAgjUUTz9fOU4oo7UE1jWIy53BqNA 1HIO18xDkhAlpM8DidNYsO7nm/f4UoN2prAf7dxLvee/HVpuZ9CcAXP6e+Q30GFMaKuB AcXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ElCEgzYJT7w+JdKbabLIuYeTly0I88jzwy4ftNw2528=; b=yJtHgj48Gaig/oonlN0jdmO8PFxTuAWHHqJ643Y+GVsO2tFDcD2pHGuMAuswDzT8VM Xt78Jl6iEEOwdj+SXHhymIl8/D6UPgwTL8qkbtUG58jbK/D7rWHTBSGlYXMeKy5txWtu 96OMI65D9Vgb4rpN8vP4QlJxp47lcblgkVLNov2Z7j/+lMePMvu2/GjDsIIlM/2LUNyE vJt+jnuMvDphmHtXLAy3uS/DAua7jhola9tvTdK7zLQDR7iSMOL7sPwLjjCOCzJpaUe6 TtXzxbiUDMWvLjf+Kw0BfAWx80DCtmTm6AgTFZwrDEExbTLLD97xuU8Q+8+CyxvZYxjd 4aQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXFn9dSypmL8g3NzeFTFHt+suItS6xw3/8b3Y/3ph9GKnkC/YWC SZ1X+cZrpGw7LaiF33Zb1rivRQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/uggTDOGIuG47jwyXDAZcTSBJndaTKT0EGAw6dBWIDnBKj6XYxSX2Ysyg0qY/bxXleleAsdg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:94cb:b0:879:ec1a:4ac with SMTP id d11-20020a17090694cb00b00879ec1a04acmr7197812ejy.76.1675382737042; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:05:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (abyl20.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.9.31.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5-20020a1709062a0500b0087be1055f83sm475393eje.206.2023.02.02.16.05.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:05:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1319a973-26ae-8c11-d967-8720aaf894df@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:05:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.0 Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: correct TLMM gpio-ranges Content-Language: en-US To: Brian Masney Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230201155105.282708-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20230201155105.282708-6-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <25f5a750-b51c-7d7b-0d50-5b2f78de8512@linaro.org> From: Konrad Dybcio In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3.02.2023 00:59, Brian Masney wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 12:45:49AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 2.02.2023 23:58, Brian Masney wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Correct the number of GPIOs in TLMM pin controller. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi >>>> index fa2d0d7d1367..17e8c26a9ae6 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi >>>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ tlmm: pinctrl@f100000 { >>>> #gpio-cells = <2>; >>>> interrupt-controller; >>>> #interrupt-cells = <2>; >>>> - gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 230>; >>>> + gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 228>; >> Won't that kill the UFS pins? > > For others quick reference, Konrad is talking about this line from > sa8540p-ride.dts: > > reset-gpios = <&tlmm 228 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > I noticed that earlier but assumed this was one based. However, looking > at pinctrl-sc8280xp.c I see gpio0..gpio227 defined. + gpio229 is the reset pin for the UFS card slot Konrad > > Brian >