From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754020Ab1KWQf3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:35:29 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56913 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751434Ab1KWQf2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:35:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1322066106.14799.84.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3.2-rc2 3/30] uprobes: register/unregister probes. From: Peter Zijlstra To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linux-mm , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Roland McGrath , Thomas Gleixner , Masami Hiramatsu , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Anton Arapov , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , Stephen Wilson Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:35:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20111118110713.10512.9461.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> References: <20111118110631.10512.73274.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20111118110713.10512.9461.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > +#define UPROBES_HASH_SZ 13 > +/* serialize (un)register */ > +static struct mutex uprobes_mutex[UPROBES_HASH_SZ]; > +#define uprobes_hash(v) (&uprobes_mutex[((unsigned long)(v)) %\ > + UPROBES_HASH_SZ]) Was there any reason to for using this hasing scheme, say over hash.h?