From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932663Ab2AMPzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:55:40 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:1497 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758374Ab2AMPze (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:55:34 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="95530484" From: Alex Shi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@gentwo.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, avi@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ying.huang@intel.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org Subject: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800 Message-Id: <1326470018-22342-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.6.3.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend for correct this. Please reply this resend email. --------------- Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for potential bisection convenience. Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace patches and final dead code clean up patch. The net, xen and x86 part code are independent. After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch at that time. Any further comments are appreciated! Regards Alex