From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (trace/events/sunrpc.h)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:30:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328758224.2200.134.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328757287.3234.76.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:14 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> Hmm.... How about if we rather take that out of the RPC_DEBUG condition?
> I'm assuming that if someone compiles in the tracepoint code, then they
> want to be able to do a full trace independently of whether or not they
> set CONFIG_SYSCTL.
Works for me.
>
> 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
> From d051b60dcc3032b71cf8d9b96ac4bf24f12b6dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:01:15 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Ensure that we can trace waitqueues when
> !defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
>
> The tracepoint code relies on the queue->name being defined in order to
> be able to display the name of the waitqueue on which an RPC task is
> sleeping.
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
> net/sunrpc/sched.c | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 3:45 linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-02 18:07 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (media/radio/wl128x) Randy Dunlap
2012-02-02 17:20 ` Manjunatha Halli
2012-02-02 18:40 ` [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2012-02-02 18:20 ` Manjunatha Halli
2012-02-05 20:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-02-02 18:10 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (trace/events/sunrpc.h) Randy Dunlap
2012-02-09 2:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-09 3:14 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-02-09 3:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-02-09 16:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-02-02 18:24 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (fs/jffs2) Randy Dunlap
2012-02-02 23:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-03 0:41 ` Brian Norris
2012-02-03 5:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-02 23:28 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (kvmtool) Randy Dunlap
2012-03-27 10:19 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328758224.2200.134.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).