From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759265Ab2BJN12 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:27:28 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:64218 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757952Ab2BJN10 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:27:26 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=HeuWv148 c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=eSfxnIkts4oA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=Y5qM8XDBzt9pMIbPRgsA:9 a=FFuwIW3Ic1X59vNOULsA:7 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1328880444.8273.3.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/8] ftrace, perf: Adding support to use function trace From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Olsa Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarapov@redhat.com Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:27:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1328643899-8361-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> References: <1327776209-4883-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1328643899-8361-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:44 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > hi, > here's another version of perf support for function trace > with filter. OK, I've applied all of these and I'm now going to run them through my test suite before sending them to Ingo. I'll let you know if anything goes wrong. Also, in the future, PLEASE do not send a new version of the patches as a reply to a previous version. It's OK to do so for a single patch, if you only modified one patch of a series. But don't make a full series a reply of the last series. It just screws up my inbox. Thanks! -- Steve