linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Test saved %rip in NMI to determine nested NMI
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:57:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329663451.25686.21.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120219125601.GD25900@elte.hu>

On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > I found that it is possible for userspace to prevent an NMI 
> > from triggering while it is running by setting its stack 
> > pointer to that of the NMI stack. This tricks the NMI nested 
> > algorithm in thinking that the NMI is nested. The easy 
> > solution to this is to test the %rip to make sure that the NMI 
> > happened in kernel mode before testing for nesting.
> 
> Ouch...

Note, it does not seem to cause any destruction, but screw up profiling.
It doesn't change how timer interrupts, or any other interrupts work.
I'm not sure what problems this can cause on a security level. But it
needs to be fixed regardless.

> 
> > I've tested a program that exhibits the missing NMIs and this 
> > patch corrects that behavior.
> 
> Does it need a -stable tag?

The nesting code was introduced in 3.3 so this does not affect any major
released version of Linux.


> Does this do the right thing for the vDSO as well? It is in 
> negative addresses:
> 
> ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0                  [vsyscall]
> 

Hmm, I thought about this as well, Can that code run with a bad stack?
It would require a process to call this code using the NMI stack
pointer, and things like push and pop would cause the code to crash
immediately with a SEGFAULT.

I could add more checks in the nested NMI path, as that is the slow path
because nested NMIs are extremely rare.

-- Steve



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-19 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-19  2:06 [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Test saved %rip in NMI to determine nested NMI Steven Rostedt
2012-02-19 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-19 13:46   ` hpanvin@gmail.com
2012-02-19 13:48     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-19 20:34     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-19 20:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-19 21:00         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-19 14:57   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-02-20  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-20 14:41       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-20 15:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-20 17:07           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-19 21:43   ` [PATCH v2][GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Test saved %cs " Steven Rostedt
2012-02-20 11:47     ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/nmi: Test saved %cs in NMI to determine nested NMI case tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-02-20 16:51       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-27 21:29         ` Greg KH
2012-02-20 18:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-20 18:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-21 22:08         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Specify a size for the cmp in the NMI handler tip-bot for Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1329663451.25686.21.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).