linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ming.m.lin@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	rjw@sisk.pl, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of function (v4)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:29:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334687359-9970-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334687359-9970-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

With commit a2ef5c4fd44ce3922435139393b89f2cce47f576
"ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c" the
wake_sleep_flags is required when calling acpi_enter_sleep_state,
which means that if there are functions outside the sleep.c code
they can't get get the wake_sleep_flags values.

This converts the function in to a exported value and converts
the module config operands to a function.

Acked-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
[v2: Parameters can be turned on/off dynamically]
[v3: unsigned char -> u8]
[v4: val -> kp->arg]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h |    2 +
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c         |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
index 416d4be..fe5fdda 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ extern long saved_magic;
 
 extern int wakeup_pmode_return;
 
+extern u8 wake_sleep_flags;
+
 extern unsigned long acpi_copy_wakeup_routine(unsigned long);
 extern void wakeup_long64(void);
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 1d661b5..eb6fd23 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -28,23 +28,33 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "sleep.h"
 
+u8 wake_sleep_flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
 static unsigned int gts, bfs;
-module_param(gts, uint, 0644);
-module_param(bfs, uint, 0644);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
-
-static u8 wake_sleep_flags(void)
+static int set_param_wake_flag(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
 {
-	u8 flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
+	int ret = param_set_int(val, kp);
 
-	if (gts)
-		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
-	if (bfs)
-		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	return flags;
+	if (kp->arg == (const char *)&gts) {
+		if (gts)
+			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
+		else
+			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
+	}
+	if (kp->arg == (const char *)&bfs) {
+		if (bfs)
+			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+		else
+			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
+	}
+	return ret;
 }
+module_param_call(gts, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &gts, 0644);
+module_param_call(bfs, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &bfs, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
 
 static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
 
@@ -263,7 +273,6 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 {
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	u32 acpi_state = acpi_target_sleep_state;
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
 	int error;
 
 	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
@@ -271,7 +280,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 	switch (acpi_state) {
 	case ACPI_STATE_S1:
 		barrier();
-		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, flags);
+		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
 		break;
 
 	case ACPI_STATE_S3:
@@ -286,7 +295,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
 	acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_SCI_ENABLE, 1);
 
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
 
 	/* ACPI 3.0 specs (P62) says that it's the responsibility
 	 * of the OSPM to clear the status bit [ implying that the
@@ -550,30 +559,27 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_begin(void)
 
 static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 
 	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
 
 	/* This shouldn't return.  If it returns, we have a problem */
-	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 
 	return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
 }
 
 static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
-
 	/*
 	 * If ACPI is not enabled by the BIOS and the boot kernel, we need to
 	 * enable it here.
 	 */
 	acpi_enable();
 	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
-	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
+	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
 	/* Check the hardware signature */
 	if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
 		printk(KERN_EMERG "ACPI: Hardware changed while hibernated, "
@@ -828,12 +834,10 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
 
 static void acpi_power_off(void)
 {
-	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
-
 	/* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__);
 	local_irq_disable();
-	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, flags);
+	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, wake_sleep_flags);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.7.5


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-17 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-17 18:29 [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-17 18:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-04-17 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/acpi: Call acpi_enter_sleep_state via an asmlinkage C function from assembler Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-17 18:36   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-08  6:31 ` [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3) Len Brown
2012-05-08 21:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08 21:53     ` Moore, Robert
2012-04-18 17:18 [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v4) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-18 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of function (v4) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-18 19:46   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1334687359-9970-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).