Re: general protection fault in rds_ib_add_one

[santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com]

On 3/1/20 6:51 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 11:55:25 -0800 Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>
>> On 3/1/20 9:46 AM, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>>>
>>> I would strongly advice this fix to be applied to the define itself,
>>> so the fix will be made for all 4 calls as well. Aka:
>>>
>>> #define ibdev_to_node(ibdev) (ibdev)->dev.parent ? dev_to_node((ibdev)->dev.parent) : NUMA_NO_NODE
>>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> Hillf, Can you please spin V2 with it ?
>>
> 
> ---8<---
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/rds: fix gpf in rds_ib_add_one
> From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> 
> The devoted syzbot reported a gpf.
> 
> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000086: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000430-0x0000000000000437]
> CPU: 0 PID: 8852 Comm: syz-executor043 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> RIP: 0010:dev_to_node include/linux/device.h:663 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:rds_ib_add_one+0x81/0xe50 net/rds/ib.c:140
> Code: b7 a8 06 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 28 00 74 08 4c 89 f7 e8 0e e4 1d fa bb 30 04 00 00 49 03 1e 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 8a 04 28 84 c0 0f 85 f0 0a 00 00 8b 1b 48 c7 c0 28 0c 09 89 48
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90003087298 EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000086 RBX: 0000000000000430 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: ffffc900030872f0 R08: ffffffff87964c3c R09: ffffed1014fd109c
> R10: ffffed1014fd109c R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff8880a7e886a8 R15: ffff8880a7e88000
> FS:  0000000000c3d880(0000) GS:ffff8880aea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f0318ed0000 CR3: 00000000a3167000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
>    add_client_context+0x482/0x660 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:681
>    enable_device_and_get+0x15b/0x370 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:1316
>    ib_register_device+0x124d/0x15b0 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:1382
>    rxe_register_device+0x3f6/0x530 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1231
>    rxe_add+0x1373/0x14f0 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c:302
>    rxe_net_add+0x79/0xe0 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c:539
>    rxe_newlink+0x31/0x90 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c:318
>    nldev_newlink+0x403/0x4a0 drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c:1538
>    rdma_nl_rcv_msg drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:195 [inline]
>    rdma_nl_rcv_skb drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:239 [inline]
>    rdma_nl_rcv+0x701/0xa20 drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:259
>    netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1302 [inline]
>    netlink_unicast+0x766/0x920 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1328
>    netlink_sendmsg+0xa2b/0xd40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1917
>    sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline]
>    sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:672 [inline]
>    ____sys_sendmsg+0x4f7/0x7f0 net/socket.c:2343
>    ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2397 [inline]
>    __sys_sendmsg+0x1ed/0x290 net/socket.c:2430
>    __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2439 [inline]
>    __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2437 [inline]
>    __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7f/0x90 net/socket.c:2437
>    do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> 
> It's fixed by falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE if needed while setting up
> device at some cost of runtime dip in performance.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+274094e62023782eeb17@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Fixes: e4c52c98e049 ("RDS/IB: add _to_node() macros for numa and use {k,v}malloc_node()")
> Cc: Andy Grover <andy.grover@oracle.com>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> ---
> 
Thanks Hillf !!