From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:11:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:11:47 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:25873 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:11:46 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Does kernel use system stdarg.h? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:26:43 +0100." <20020928182643.A13064@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:16:55 +1000 Message-ID: <13406.1033262215@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:26:43 +0100, Russell King wrote: >This seems to leave us with no official guaranteed way to get at the >compiler specific includes, which is Bad News(tm). We obviously can't >use "-I/usr/lib/gcc-lib/`gcc -dumpmachine`/`gcc -dumpversion`/" and >we've already had problems with the 2.4 "gcc -print-search-dirs" >version. LANG=C gcc -print-search-dirs | sed ...