linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] kvm: level irqfd support
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:37:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345135074.4683.476.camel@ul30vt.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502D1FF4.20506@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 19:29 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 10:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:28 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:37:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> > > v8:
> >> > > 
> >> > > Trying a new approach.  Nobody seems to like the internal IRQ
> >> > > source ID object and the interactions it implies between irqfd
> >> > > and eoifd, so let's get rid of it.  Instead, simply expose
> >> > > IRQ source IDs to userspace.  This lets the user be in charge
> >> > > of freeing them or hanging onto a source ID for later use.
> >> > 
> >> > In the end it turns out source ID is an optimization for shared
> >> > interrupts, isn't it?  Can't we apply the optimization transparently to
> >> > the user?  E.g. if we have some spare source IDs, allocate them, if we
> >> > run out, use a shared source ID?
> >> 
> >> Let's think about shared source IDs a bit more.  I think it's wrong that
> >> irqfd uses KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, but I'm questioning whether all
> >> irqfd users can share a source ID.  We do not get the logical OR of all
> >> users by putting them on the same source ID, we get "last set wins".
> >> KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID is used for multiple inputs because the
> >> logical OR happens in userspace.  How would we not starve a user if we
> >> define KVM_IRQFD_SOURCE_ID?  What am I missing?
> > 
> > That all irqfds are deasserted on EOI anyway.  So there's no point
> > to do a logical OR.
> > 
> > 
> 
> What if a level irqfd shares a line with a KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl?  Then an
> EOI can de-assert the irqfd source, but the line is kept high by the
> last KVM_IRQ_LINE invocation.

As I understand Michael's proposal, the shared irq source id used by
level-deassert-irqfds can only be asserted via an irqfd injection and
can only be de-asserted by the ack notifier.  If we let any other
interface have access to the irq source id it breaks.  If KVM_IRQ_LINE
picks up and extension to specify the irq source id, it would have to be
prevented from accessing this one.  Thanks,

Alex




  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-10 22:37 [PATCH v8 0/6] kvm: level irqfd support Alex Williamson
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] kvm: Allow filtering of acked irqs Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 12:27   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 16:47     ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 19:24       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] kvm: Expose IRQ source IDs to userspace Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 12:59   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 17:05     ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] kvm: Add IRQ source ID option to KVM_IRQFD Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 13:49   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 17:08     ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] kvm: Add assert-only " Alex Williamson
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] kvm: KVM_IRQ_ACKFD Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 14:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 17:17     ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-10 22:37 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] kvm: Add de-assert option to KVM_IRQ_ACKFD Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 14:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 17:24     ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 14:28 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] kvm: level irqfd support Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 17:36   ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-15 19:22     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-15 19:59       ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-16 12:34         ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-16 12:53           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-16 16:29       ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-16 16:36         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-16 16:39           ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-16 16:54             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-16 16:54               ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-16 17:01                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-16 16:37         ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2012-08-16 16:32 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-16 16:45   ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345135074.4683.476.camel@ul30vt.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).