On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 11:51 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > While you suggestion is clever, do we really benefit from this?
> 
> Artem, please note this is just a side effect of what I've suggested
> (that its, continue parsing after first truncated partition), not a real
> use case I'd expect and intentionally wish to support.

Sorry, I was not reading carefully enough. Could you please recap - are
you fine with Huang's latest patch-set or not :) To me sorting and then
dropping 0-size partitions looks like a simple and robust approach.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy