From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Subject: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Lock down IO port access in secure boot environments Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:55:09 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1346774117-2277-4-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1346774117-2277-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> IO port access would permit users to gain access to PCI configuration registers, which in turn (on a lot of hardware) give access to MMIO register space. This would potentially permit root to trigger arbitrary DMA, so lock it down by default. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c | 4 ++-- drivers/char/mem.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c index 8c96897..c3a1bb2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int turn_on) if ((from + num <= from) || (from + num > IO_BITMAP_BITS)) return -EINVAL; - if (turn_on && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) + if (turn_on && (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) || !capable(CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE))) return -EPERM; /* @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ long sys_iopl(unsigned int level, struct pt_regs *regs) return -EINVAL; /* Trying to gain more privileges? */ if (level > old) { - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) || !capable(CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE)) return -EPERM; } regs->flags = (regs->flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IOPL) | (level << 12); diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c index e5eedfa2..8f5f872 100644 --- a/drivers/char/mem.c +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c @@ -597,6 +597,9 @@ static ssize_t write_port(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, unsigned long i = *ppos; const char __user * tmp = buf; + if (!capable(CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE)) + return -EPERM; + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, buf, count)) return -EFAULT; while (count-- > 0 && i < 65536) { -- 1.7.11.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 15:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-09-04 15:55 [RFC] First attempt at kernel secure boot support Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] Secure boot: Add new capability Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] PCI: Lock down BAR access in secure boot environments Matthew Garrett 2012-10-01 21:00 ` Pavel Machek 2012-09-04 15:55 ` Matthew Garrett [this message] 2012-09-04 16:16 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: Lock down IO port " Alan Cox 2012-09-04 16:16 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] ACPI: Limit access to custom_method Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 16:12 ` Alan Cox 2012-09-04 16:13 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem in secure boot setups Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] kexec: Disable in a secure boot environment Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 20:13 ` Eric W. Biederman 2012-09-04 20:22 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 21:13 ` Eric W. Biederman 2012-09-04 21:27 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 22:12 ` Eric W. Biederman 2012-09-04 23:25 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-05 4:33 ` Eric W. Biederman 2012-09-05 5:16 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-05 7:00 ` Eric W. Biederman 2012-09-05 7:03 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 21:39 ` Alan Cox 2012-09-04 21:40 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-05 15:43 ` Roland Eggner 2012-09-05 15:46 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-05 21:13 ` Mimi Zohar 2012-09-05 21:41 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-05 21:49 ` Eric Paris 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] Secure boot: Add a dummy kernel parameter that will switch on Secure Boot mode Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] efi: Enable secure boot lockdown automatically when enabled in firmware Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter in a secure boot environment Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 16:30 ` Shuah Khan 2012-09-04 16:38 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 16:44 ` Shuah Khan 2012-09-04 20:37 ` Alan Cox 2012-09-04 20:37 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 20:50 ` Josh Boyer 2012-09-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] SELinux: define mapping for new Secure Boot capability Matthew Garrett 2012-09-04 16:08 ` [RFC] First attempt at kernel secure boot support Alan Cox 2012-09-04 16:12 ` Matthew Garrett 2012-10-01 21:07 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1346774117-2277-4-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com \ --to=mjg@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Lock down IO port access in secure boot environments' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).