From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759113Ab2IFQyV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:54:21 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48476 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752132Ab2IFQyT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:54:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1346950364.18408.38.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/26] rcu: Exit RCU extended QS on kernel preemption after irq/exception From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org, Alessio Igor Bogani , Avi Kivity , Chris Metcalf , Christoph Lameter , Geoff Levand , Gilad Ben Yossef , Hakan Akkan , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Kevin Hilman , Max Krasnyansky , Stephen Hemminger , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:52:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1346360743-3628-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120830210520.GA2824@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1346360743-3628-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1346360743-3628-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 14:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > From: Frederic Weisbecker > > When an exception or an irq exits, and we are going to resume into > interrupted kernel code, the low level architecture code calls > preempt_schedule_irq() if there is a need to reschedule. > > If the interrupt/exception occured between a call to rcu_user_enter() > (from syscall exit, exception exit, do_notify_resume exit, ...) and > a real resume to userspace (iret,...), preempt_schedule_irq() can be > called whereas RCU thinks we are in userspace. But preempt_schedule_irq() > is going to run kernel code and may be some RCU read side critical > section. We must exit the userspace extended quiescent state before > we call it. > > To solve this, just call rcu_user_exit() in the beginning of > preempt_schedule_irq(). > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 07c6d9a..0bd599b 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -3564,6 +3564,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void) > /* Catch callers which need to be fixed */ > BUG_ON(ti->preempt_count || !irqs_disabled()); > > + rcu_user_exit(); > do { > add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); > local_irq_enable(); But in this case you want to restart the tick as well, are we going to add a nohz_user_exit() like call as well, or do we have something that does both?