From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933074Ab2IFSny (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:43:54 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:46814 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932373Ab2IFSnx (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:43:53 -0400 Message-ID: <1346957026.13424.5.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dev_ and dynamic_debug cleanups From: Joe Perches To: Jason Baron Cc: Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" , Jim Cromie , Kay Sievers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:43:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120906175158.GB9786@redhat.com> References: <20120906175158.GB9786@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean. > > Neaten the style for dynamic_debug. > > Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk > > Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg. > > > > Joe Perches (5): > > dev_dbg/dynamic_debug: Update to use printk_emit, optimize stack > > netdev_printk/dynamic_netdev_dbg: Directly call printk_emit > > netdev_printk/netif_printk: Remove a superfluous logging colon > > dev: Add dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit > > device and dynamic_debug: Use dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit > > > > Looks Good. > > The one thing that is bothering me though, is that for > __dynamic_dev_dbg(), __dynamic_netdev_dbg(), we are copying much of the core > logic of __dev_printk(), __netdev_printk(), respectively. I would prefer > have this in one place. Can we add a 'prefix' argument to __dev_printk(), > and __netdev_printk() that dynamic debug can use, but is simply empty > for dev_printk() and netdev_printk(). I don't think that's an improvement actually. Why don't you try it.