From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754238Ab2IGPQN (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:16:13 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:28999 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750838Ab2IGPQJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:16:09 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Vb91zSV9 c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=jUoZk2RAzk0A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=xkD7W5DCUvkA:10 a=rh8eSfn3mH2FHeiFsLYA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1347030967.8178.15.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context From: Steven Rostedt To: Josh Triplett Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:16:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120907144717.GA22059@leaf> References: <20120904223350.GQ2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1346799082.27919.31.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120904230834.GB11494@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346801031.27919.39.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120904233344.GB11855@jtriplet-mobl1> <20120904234307.GY2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120906185402.GB5738@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346961244.1680.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120907060940.GA21166@leaf> <20120907142441.GD2462@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120907144717.GA22059@leaf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 07:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches, > > > > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme. > > > > > > > > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent? > > > > > > > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready > > > > for another 3.7 push to tip. > > > > > > Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the > > > corresponding bits in the RCU patch series? > > > > All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct? > > If so, full speed ahead! > > Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make > sure Steve's push goes in before yours. > Is there any rush to do this? I just plan on pushing it for 3.7. Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo can pull into the RCU branch too. -- Steve