From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751962AbbESVh0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 17:37:26 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:55575 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751789AbbESVhW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 17:37:22 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Stefan Agner Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, Russell King - ARM Linux , jason@lakedaemon.net, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, marc.zyngier@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, galak@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner , shawn.guo@linaro.org, Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:37:06 +0200 Message-ID: <13528657.zN9ZgZvvxB@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0103afd0e9dd50c1bf85153a38a3490f@agner.ch> References: <1431769465-26867-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> <0103afd0e9dd50c1bf85153a38a3490f@agner.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:asc2ieI7++i1tm88lTZEUCey5xXUwxrDKU3XuQBEmeY8jBmTXWV GR97Zgun2wzCWLDmr05mKMkg3kIXzZpGsIpB0GHL1tYIlq+FYD0zFpncWzubrKzOFdqL+h9 fxfXuKSF67oEen+suH7SPofk/RBCC2RqQNad4inAxht1+QnHGZ4iJyBgSR3m68VT6q/OoVl WzOVG0bPURXAsuB/XM9yA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:26:53 Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2015-05-19 20:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 18:06:53 Stefan Agner wrote: > >> On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later > >> > patches? > >> > >> Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default > >> of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M > >> platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, > >> which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. > > > > An easy approach would be to list both ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and > > EFM32 in the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE option initially, and then > > follow-up with a patch that converts the three other platforms > > (efm32, stm32 and lpc18xx) to ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and also > > change the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE statement. > > > > Note that I've already added both stm32 and lpc18xx to the > > UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE list in the next/soc branch. > > Afaiks, only ARCH_LPC18XX is in UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE, probably STM32 > doesn't support compressed image/earlyprintk? It's actually a bug, and I have sent a patch to add the entry (and was looking at my local tree), but haven't applied the fix to the next/soc branch yet. > >> > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as > >> > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also > >> > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), > >> > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather > >> > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on > >> > next/soc. > >> > >> I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) > > > > I'm fine with that, too. If Shawn thinks the patches are ok, you can > > just send all patches you want me to apply in arm-soc based on > > the appropriate branches (next/soc, next/dt and next/defconfig, I > > presume), and I'll apply them this time. In the future, you should > > send all patches to Shawn though. > > Ok, I will rebase this patchset (06-13) then, send the clocksource patch > (07) as a single patch and send the EFM32 convertion patch (10) together > with a conversion patch of the other two platforms as a follow-up. Ok, sounds good. Arnd