linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: ondemand: handle SW coordinated CPUs
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:06:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353413176-21723-2-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353413176-21723-1-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>

From: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>

This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by the ondemand
governor.

This patch make sure that deferred timers are run on all CPUs in the
case of software controlled CPUs that run on the same frequency.

Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 396322f..430f614 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct cpu_dbs_info_s {
 	 * when user is changing the governor or limits.
 	 */
 	struct mutex timer_mutex;
+	ktime_t time_stamp;
 };
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, od_cpu_dbs_info);
 
@@ -285,7 +286,7 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(unsigned int new_rate)
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
 			continue;
-		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu);
+		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 
 		mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
@@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(unsigned int new_rate)
 			cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->work);
 			mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
 
-			schedule_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, &dbs_info->work,
+			schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dbs_info->work,
 						 usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate));
 
 		}
@@ -449,6 +450,16 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_group = {
 
 /************************** sysfs end ************************/
 
+static bool dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cur_policy;
+
+	if (cpumask_weight(policy->cpus) > 1)
+		return true;
+	else
+		return false;
+}
+
 static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *p, unsigned int freq)
 {
 	if (dbs_tuners_ins.powersave_bias)
@@ -598,20 +609,41 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info)
 
 static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+	struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(work);
 	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
 		container_of(work, struct cpu_dbs_info_s, work.work);
-	unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cpu;
-	int sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
-
+	int sample_type;
 	int delay;
+	bool sample = true;
+
+	if (dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus(dbs_info)) {
+		ktime_t time_now;
+		s64 delta_us;
+
+		/* use leader CPU's dbs_info */
+		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, dbs_info->cpu);
+		mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
 
-	mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
+		time_now = ktime_get();
+		delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, dbs_info->time_stamp);
+
+		/* Do nothing if we recently have sampled */
+		if (delta_us < (s64)(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate / 2))
+			sample = false;
+		else
+			dbs_info->time_stamp = time_now;
+	} else {
+		mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
+	}
+
+	sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
 
 	/* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */
 	dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
 	if (!dbs_tuners_ins.powersave_bias ||
 	    sample_type == DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE) {
-		dbs_check_cpu(dbs_info);
+		if (sample)
+			dbs_check_cpu(dbs_info);
 		if (dbs_info->freq_lo) {
 			/* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */
 			dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_SUB_SAMPLE;
@@ -627,32 +659,41 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
 				delay -= jiffies % delay;
 		}
 	} else {
-		__cpufreq_driver_target(dbs_info->cur_policy,
-			dbs_info->freq_lo, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+		if (sample)
+			__cpufreq_driver_target(dbs_info->cur_policy,
+						dbs_info->freq_lo,
+						CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
 		delay = dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies;
 	}
-	schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
+	schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), dw, delay);
 	mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
 }
 
-static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
+static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info, int cpu)
 {
 	/* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */
 	int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate);
+	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info_local = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 
 	if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
 		delay -= jiffies % delay;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info_local->work);
 	dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
-	INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
-	schedule_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
+	schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dbs_info_local->work, delay);
 }
 
-static inline void dbs_timer_exit(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
+static inline void dbs_timer_exit(int cpu)
 {
+	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->work);
 }
 
+static void dbs_timer_exit_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
+{
+	dbs_timer_exit(smp_processor_id());
+}
+
 /*
  * Not all CPUs want IO time to be accounted as busy; this dependson how
  * efficient idling at a higher frequency/voltage is.
@@ -676,6 +717,43 @@ static int should_io_be_busy(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int __cpuinit cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+				  unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
+	struct device *cpu_dev;
+	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
+
+	dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
+
+	/* use leader CPU's dbs_info */
+	if (dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus(dbs_info))
+		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, dbs_info->cpu);
+
+	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+	if (cpu_dev) {
+		switch (action) {
+		case CPU_ONLINE:
+		case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
+			dbs_timer_init(dbs_info, cpu);
+			break;
+		case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
+		case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
+			dbs_timer_exit(cpu);
+			break;
+		case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
+		case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
+			dbs_timer_init(dbs_info, cpu);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block __refdata ondemand_cpu_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call = cpu_callback,
+};
+
 static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				   unsigned int event)
 {
@@ -704,9 +782,13 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 			if (dbs_tuners_ins.ignore_nice)
 				j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_nice =
 						kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
+
+			mutex_init(&j_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
+			INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&j_dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
+
+			j_dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
 		}
 		this_dbs_info->cpu = cpu;
-		this_dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
 		ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
 		/*
 		 * Start the timerschedule work, when this governor
@@ -736,21 +818,42 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
 
-		mutex_init(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
-		dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
+		/* If SW coordinated CPUs then register notifier */
+		if (dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus(this_dbs_info)) {
+			register_hotcpu_notifier(&ondemand_cpu_notifier);
+
+			/* Initiate timer time stamp */
+			this_dbs_info->time_stamp = ktime_get();
+
+			for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
+				struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
+
+				j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
+				dbs_timer_init(j_dbs_info, j);
+			}
+		} else {
+			dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info, cpu);
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
-		dbs_timer_exit(this_dbs_info);
+		dbs_timer_exit(cpu);
 
 		mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
 		mutex_destroy(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
 		dbs_enable--;
 		mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
-		if (!dbs_enable)
+		if (!dbs_enable) {
 			sysfs_remove_group(cpufreq_global_kobject,
 					   &dbs_attr_group);
 
+			if (dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus(this_dbs_info)) {
+				/* Make sure all pending timers/works are
+				 * stopped. */
+				schedule_on_each_cpu(dbs_timer_exit_per_cpu);
+				unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&ondemand_cpu_notifier);
+			}
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
-- 
1.7.12.1


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-20 12:06 [PATCH v3] cpufreq: ondemand: handle SW coordinated CPUs Fabio Baltieri
2012-11-20 12:06 ` Fabio Baltieri [this message]
2012-11-22  0:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-22 17:02     ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-11-22 21:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1353413176-21723-2-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
    --to=fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rickard.andersson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).