On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 10:54 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > ------------------ > > From: Dan Carpenter > > commit 5bc9ad774c063f6b41965e7314f2c26aa5e465a0 upstream. > > Gcc 4.6.2 complains that: > > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c: In function `lp5521_load_program': > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c:214:21: warning: `mode' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c: In function `lp5521_probe': > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c:788:5: warning: `buf' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c:740:6: warning: `ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] > > These are real problems if lp5521_read() returns an error. When that > happens we should handle it, instead of ignoring it or doing a bitwise > OR with all the other error codes and continuing. [...] > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c [...] > @@ -785,7 +789,7 @@ static int __devinit lp5521_probe(struct > * LP5521_REG_ENABLE register will not have any effect - strange! > */ > ret = lp5521_read(client, LP5521_REG_R_CURRENT, &buf); > - if (buf != LP5521_REG_R_CURR_DEFAULT) { > + if (ret || buf != LP5521_REG_R_CURR_DEFAULT) { > dev_err(&client->dev, "error in resetting chip\n"); > goto fail2; > } lp5521_probe() is going to return 0 if ret == 0 && buf != LP5521_REG_R_CURR_DEFAULT here. It needs to set an error code. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.