From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751894Ab2LCSrE (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:47:04 -0500 Received: from [206.117.179.246] ([206.117.179.246]:59392 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874Ab2LCSrB (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1354560401.3524.3.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: Remove unused cEVENT macro From: Joe Perches To: Steve French , Theodore Tso Cc: Jeff Layton , Steve French , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:46:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <7176cb20d420849d72aa004e40a404049362da7f.1354217746.git.joe@perches.com> <20121130064710.1bcd227b@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 09:39 -0600, Steve French wrote: > But ... the need still remains for more tracing for cifs (I run into > this a few times a month at least when debugging) - does anyone have > any ideas for how to add dynamic trace points to cifs (has anyone even > done it for the vfs?) - is there any file system that does a good job > defining dynamic trace points? I believe ext4 is the only filesystem with significant use of tracepoints. Ted? Any tips you care to give as to best implementation methods?