On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 22:31 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > Hi Ben, > > At Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:04:02 +0100, > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Tejun Heo > > > > commit 5edee61edeaaebafe584f8fb7074c1ef4658596b upstream. [...] > I failed to compile 3.2.36-rc1 with my x86_64 box with enabling cgroup. > > build log: > =============================================================================== > ... > CC kernel/cgroup.o > kernel/cgroup.c: In function ‘cgroup_post_fork’: > kernel/cgroup.c:4540:5: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ss->fork’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > kernel/cgroup.c:4540:5: note: expected ‘struct cgroup_subsys *’ but argument is of type ‘struct task_struct *’ > kernel/cgroup.c:4540:5: error: too few arguments to function ‘ss->fork’ > make[2]: *** [kernel/cgroup.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [kernel] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sat/src/linux-stable' > make: *** [debian/stamp/build/kernel] Error 2 > =============================================================================== > > It comes from the ss->fork()'s API change introduced by commit 761b3ef50e1c2. [...] > I found you mentioned this difference in the desctiption as follows. > > > - cgroup_subsys::fork takes cgroup_subsys pointer as first parameter] > > I guess you attached the wrong patch, or you forgot to modify the > original patch. Here is the correct patch for the latter case. It just > change "ss->fork(child)" to "ss->fork(ss, child)" as your description. [...] The correct version is in the combined patch, but I somehow missed refreshing this individual patch. Thanks for pointing this out. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.