From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] staging/fwserial: Address reviewer comments
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:59:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357657153.3420.3.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107232206.GA15244@kroah.com>
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 15:22 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 01:03:14AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > Overdue respin.
> > v2 changes:
> > Don't use 'card' when referring to firewire node
> > Removed lower clamp in link_speed_to_max_payload()
> > Ripped out the bandwidth limit logic
> > Drop suggestion to integrate link_speed_to_max_payload()
> > & device_max_receive()
> > Note required minimum max_rec value for OHCI-compliant devices
>
> Ugh, I applied the first version of this series, many apologies. Can
> you send me follow-on patches with just the differences here?
I saw that - no worries. I'll send follow-on patches today or tomorrow.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-15 6:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] staging/fwserial: Address reviewer comments Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] staging/fwserial: Refine Kconfig help text Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] staging/fwserial: Remove bandwidth limit logic Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] staging/fwserial: Limit tx/rx to 1394-2008 spec maximum Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] staging/fwserial: Update TODO file per reviewer comments Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] staging/fwserial: Assume firmware is OHCI-complaint Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] staging/fwserial: Drop suggestion for helper fn integration Peter Hurley
2012-12-15 12:34 ` Stefan Richter
2012-12-15 16:09 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-07 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] staging/fwserial: Address reviewer comments Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-08 14:59 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] staging/fwserial: Remove bandwidth limit logic Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] staging/fwserial: Refer to fw_device as "node" Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] staging/fwserial: Simplify max payload calculation Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] staging/fwserial: Fold constant MAX_ASYNC_PAYLOAD Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] staging/fwserial: Assume firmware is OHCI-complaint Peter Hurley
2013-01-29 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] staging/fwserial: Drop suggestion for helper fn integration Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357657153.3420.3.camel@thor.lan \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).