From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934830Ab3BNSsP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:48:15 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:27764 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758544Ab3BNSsO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:48:14 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H5hZMpki c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=1ADFm0T--rEA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=mYRWiXiH8qgA:10 a=qt-cEr8D9w_SCmFrzwcA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1360867691.23152.48.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead From: Steven Rostedt To: Jan Kara Cc: LKML , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrew Morton , jslaby@suse.cz, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "kay.sievers" Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:48:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130212122245.GB19583@quack.suse.cz> References: <1360112748.2621.25.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130206230220.GA18329@quack.suse.cz> <20130212122245.GB19583@quack.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:22 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Anyway, what do you guys think about this version? > Steven, Andrew, did you have a chance to look at my patches? Can you resend without being attachments. Patches sent as attachments seldom get reviewed. -- Steve