On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:58 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:42:17AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 03/05/2013 01:16 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > [+cc e1000-devel, Jeff, Bruce] > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > >>> So it looks Bjorn has taken most of them and the e1000e one will go > > >>> through the e1000e maintainers. I'll test after the merge window is > > >>> done. > > >> > > >> Issue still persists on 3.9-rc1 :-( : > > >> > > >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412541] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx > > >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412554] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO > > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034158] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0. > > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034166] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034168] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue > > > > > > The e1000e changes didn't get merged, did they? I don't see the > > > following changes mentioned at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185 in > > > 3.9-rc1: > > > > > > e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance > > > e1000e: fix runtime power management transitions > > > e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device > > > > You're right. They are not even in -next :(. > > Oh, and there's another issue with this driver I reported yesterday: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136243374114892&w=2: > > "Trying to free already-free IRQ 20" > > which happens during suspend so it seems also related. > > Rafael, what's the state of those patches here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185, are they ready to be tested or you > still have issues with them? They are in my queue of e1000e patches for net and are being testing currently. I should be able to push them upstream this week.