From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932368Ab3CSAHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:07:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4851 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932306Ab3CSAH2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:07:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:06:35 -0400 From: Naoya Horiguchi To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , KOSAKI Motohiro , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1363651595-ewr7efx1-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> In-Reply-To: <20130318153300.GR10192@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1361475708-25991-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1361475708-25991-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <20130318152224.GQ10192@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130318153300.GR10192@dhcp22.suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] migrate: make core migration code aware of hugepage Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mutt-References: <20130318153300.GR10192@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Mutt-Fcc: ~/Maildir/sent/ User-Agent: Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:33:00PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 18-03-13 16:22:24, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 21-02-13 14:41:41, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > [...] > > > diff --git v3.8.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h v3.8/include/linux/mempolicy.h > > > index 0d7df39..2e475b5 100644 > > > --- v3.8.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h > > > +++ v3.8/include/linux/mempolicy.h > > > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ extern int mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct mempolicy *pol); > > > /* Check if a vma is migratable */ > > > static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > > { > > > - if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP)) > > > + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) > > > return 0; > > > > Is this safe? At least check_*_range don't seem to be hugetlb aware. > > Ohh, they become in 5/9. Should that one be reordered then? OK, I'll shift this change after 5/9 patch. Naoya