From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964825Ab3CZO4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:56:44 -0400 Received: from smtp15.mail.ru ([94.100.176.133]:34312 "EHLO smtp15.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754119Ab3CZO4n (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:56:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: Elimination the forced speed reduction algorithm. From: Kirill Kapranov Reply-To: kapranoff@inbox.ru To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, bhutchings@solarflare.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, joe@perches.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1364304872-6408-1-git-send-email-kapranoff@inbox.ru> References: <1364304872-6408-1-git-send-email-kapranoff@inbox.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R" Organization: NITA, LLC Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:56:32 +0400 Message-ID: <1364309792.2874.2.camel@kkk.nita.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Does the absence of criticism mean that this patch is ready for upstream? Maybe I shall write more verbose explanation additionally?