linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
To: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: "matt.fleming@intel.com" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:57:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366804640.13667.27.camel@x230.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366801173.23707.323.camel@linux-s257.site>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 583 bytes --]

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 18:59 +0800, joeyli wrote:

> Then why we don't just remove the "remaining_size" condition but only
> monitor the active_size should not larger then 1/2 storage_size?

If we calculate active_size as using more than 50% of the storage space
but remaining_size says we still have more than 50% available, we should
trust remaining_size instead of active_size.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-10  2:41 [PATCH 1/3] efi: Determine how much space is used by boot services-only variables Matthew Garrett
2013-04-10  2:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "x86, efivars: firmware bug workarounds should be in platform code" Matthew Garrett
2013-04-10  2:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space Matthew Garrett
2013-04-10  6:02   ` Lingzhu Xiang
2013-04-10 17:46 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] efi: Determine how much space is used by boot services-only variables Matthew Garrett
2013-04-10 17:46   ` [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "x86, efivars: firmware bug workarounds should be in platform code" Matthew Garrett
2013-04-11 13:24     ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-11 13:30       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-10 17:46   ` [PATCH V4 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space Matthew Garrett
2013-04-12 10:16   ` [PATCH V4 1/3] efi: Determine how much space is used by boot services-only variables Lingzhu Xiang
2013-04-12 10:22     ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-12 12:19   ` Lingzhu Xiang
2013-04-15 15:53 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code Matthew Garrett
2013-04-15 15:53   ` [PATCH V5 2/2] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space Matthew Garrett
2013-04-15 20:09 ` Fix UEFI variable paranoia Matthew Garrett
2013-04-15 20:09   ` [PATCH V6 1/3] Move utf16 functions to kernel core and rename Matthew Garrett
2013-04-15 20:09   ` [PATCH V6 2/3] efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code Matthew Garrett
2013-04-22 15:03     ` Paul Bolle
2013-04-15 20:09   ` [PATCH V6 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space Matthew Garrett
2013-04-16 14:31     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/Kconfig: Make EFI select UCS2_STRING Sergey Vlasov
2013-04-16 14:31       ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Export efi_query_variable_store() for efivars.ko Sergey Vlasov
2013-04-16 16:39         ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-16 16:39       ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/Kconfig: Make EFI select UCS2_STRING Matt Fleming
2013-04-17 10:49     ` [PATCH V6 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space Lingzhu Xiang
2013-04-24 10:08     ` joeyli
2013-04-24 10:14       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-24 10:59         ` joeyli
2013-04-24 11:57           ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2013-04-24 13:23             ` joeyli
2013-04-16 10:15   ` Fix UEFI variable paranoia Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1366804640.13667.27.camel@x230.lan \
    --to=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).