From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 RFC] ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:49:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367365778.16154.144.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2740694.MNypEzdXxd@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Modify the generic ACPI hotplug code to be able to check if devices
> scheduled for hot-removal may be gracefully removed from the system
> using the device offline/online mechanism introduced previously.
>
> Namely, make acpi_scan_hot_remove() which handles device hot-removal
> call device_offline() for all physical companions of the ACPI device
> nodes involved in the operation and check the results. If any of
> the device_offline() calls fails, the function will not progress to
> the removal phase (which cannot be aborted), unless its (new) force
> argument is set (in case of a failing offline it will put the devices
> offlined by it back online).
>
> In support of the 'forced' hot-removal, add a new sysfs attribute
> 'force_remove' that will reside in every ACPI hotplug profile
> present under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-acpi | 9 +-
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 2
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 27 +++++++
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3
> 5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,61 @@ acpi_device_modalias_show(struct device
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(modalias, 0444, acpi_device_modalias_show, NULL);
>
> -static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static acpi_status acpi_bus_offline_companions(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
> + void *data, void **ret_p)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> + struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> + bool force = *((bool *)data);
> + acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> +
> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&device->physical_node_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pn, &device->physical_node_list, node) {
I do not think physical_node_list is set for ACPI processor devices, so
this code is NOP at this point. I think properly initializing
physical_node_list for CPU and memblk is one of the key items in this
approach.
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = device_offline(pn->dev);
> + if (force)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + status = AE_ERROR;
> + break;
> + }
> + pn->put_online = !ret;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&device->physical_node_lock);
> +
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status acpi_bus_online_companions(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
> + void *data, void **ret_p)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> + struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> +
> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&device->physical_node_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pn, &device->physical_node_list, node)
> + if (pn->put_online) {
> + device_online(pn->dev);
> + pn->put_online = false;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&device->physical_node_lock);
> +
> + return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device, bool force)
> {
> acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> acpi_handle not_used;
> @@ -136,10 +190,30 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct a
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + lock_device_offline();
> +
> + status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + NULL, acpi_bus_offline_companions, &force,
> + NULL);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) || force)
> + status = acpi_bus_offline_companions(handle, 0, &force, NULL);
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && !force) {
> + acpi_bus_online_companions(handle, 0, NULL, NULL);
> + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + acpi_bus_online_companions, NULL, NULL,
> + NULL);
> + unlock_device_offline();
Don't we need put_device(&device->dev) here?
Thanks,
-Toshi
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 12:23 [PATCH 0/3 RFC] Driver core / ACPI: Add offline/online for graceful hot-removal of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-29 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/3 RFC] Driver core: Add offline/online device operations Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-29 23:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-30 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-30 15:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-30 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-30 23:38 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-02 0:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 23:29 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-03 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-29 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/3 RFC] Driver core: Use generic offline/online for CPU offline/online Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-29 23:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-30 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-30 15:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-30 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-30 23:42 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-01 14:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-01 20:07 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-02 0:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-29 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/3 RFC] ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-30 23:49 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-05-01 15:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-01 20:20 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-02 0:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] Driver core / ACPI: Add offline/online for graceful hot-removal of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] Driver core: Add offline/online device operations Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 13:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-02 23:11 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-02 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 23:23 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-02 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] Driver core: Use generic offline/online for CPU offline/online Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 13:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-02 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 12:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-02 13:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-02 23:20 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-03 12:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-03 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-03 18:27 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-03 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-03 19:34 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-04 1:01 ` [PATCH 0/3 RFC] Driver core: Add offline/online callbacks for memory_subsys Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-04 1:03 ` [PATCH 1/3 RFC] ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-04 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/3 RFC] Driver core: Introduce types of device "online" Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-04 1:06 ` [PATCH 3/3 RFC] Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks for memory blocks Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-04 11:11 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2, RFC] Driver core: Add offline/online callbacks for memory_subsys Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-04 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2, RFC] ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-21 6:50 ` Tang Chen
2013-05-04 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2, RFC] Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks for memory blocks Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-06 16:28 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-05-07 0:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-07 10:59 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-05-07 12:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-07 21:03 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-07 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-07 22:45 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-07 23:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-07 23:59 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-08 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-08 0:37 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-08 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-08 14:38 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-06 17:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-06 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-21 6:37 ` Tang Chen
2013-05-21 11:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-22 4:45 ` Tang Chen
2013-05-22 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-22 22:06 ` [PATCH] Driver core / memory: Simplify __memory_block_change_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-22 22:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-22 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-23 4:37 ` Tang Chen
2013-05-06 10:48 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2, RFC] Driver core: Add offline/online callbacks for memory_subsys Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367365778.16154.144.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).