From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] sched: Distangle worker accounting from rq->lock
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:57:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367542669.7373.10.camel@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503001206.GA19814@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 17:12 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:47:10PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:37:22AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > [ Blast from the past! ]
> > >
> > > When merging in 3.4.42 into the 3.4-rt branch I hit a conflict with the
> > > try_to_wake_up_local() call. It seems that the 3.4-rt patch has this
> > > patch applied. Although, this is not applied to any of the other -rt patches.
> > >
> >
> > I take that back. It's in 3.0-rt, 3.2-rt and 3.4-rt, but it's not in 3.6-rt
> > nor in 3.8-rt.
>
> So, it's all good? Or is there something I need to look into?
It looks good to me. I don't know why it's not in 3.6-rt or 3.8-rt. Was
there a reason that Thomas took it out? I don't know. Maybe it's not
needed or he thought it went mainline?
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 17:52 [patch 0/4] sched: Move work out of the scheduler core Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 17:52 ` [patch 1/4] sched: Separate the scheduler entry for preemption Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 18:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-22 18:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 19:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-22 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-23 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2011-08-29 14:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 17:52 ` [patch 3/4] block: Shorten interrupt disabled regions Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 17:52 ` [patch 2/4] sched: Move blk_schedule_flush_plug() out of __schedule() Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 17:52 ` [patch 4/4] sched: Distangle worker accounting from rq->lock Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-22 19:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-23 8:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 9:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-23 10:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-23 11:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-24 9:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-26 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-30 13:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-30 22:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-03 0:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-03 0:57 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-07-24 10:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-06 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367542669.7373.10.camel@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).