From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758851Ab3GROjM (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:39:12 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:31053 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394Ab3GROjK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:39:10 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aqMw+FlV c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=jG05uceuGy4A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=5uFaiv9cfuIA:10 a=dCrHwhn5Zh8xi4oE9DwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Message-ID: <1374158349.6458.237.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracing: more list_empty(perf_events) checks From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Masami Hiramatsu , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Srikar Dronamraju , "zhangwei(Jovi)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:39:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130718094237.GI27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20130617170142.GA19780@redhat.com> <1374116446.6458.203.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130718094237.GI27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 11:42 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:00:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Peter, > > > > These have been discussed, and they mostly live in the tracing > > directory, but are perf related. Can you give me your Acked-by on them. > > I haven't looked in detail, but I trust Oleg. The only thing I can > remember is that I objected to the changelogs in that it wasn't at all > clear why we were doing these patches (Oleg did clarify in a separate > email, not sure the changelogs were ammended). > > Other than that sure, go ahead. Oleg, did you update the change logs? These patches look the same as what was in your mbox. Or did Peter have an issues with the change log of another patch? -- Steve