From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751014Ab3IGHM4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2013 03:12:56 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:53625 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915Ab3IGHMz (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2013 03:12:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1378537960.4539.9.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [git pull] Please pull powerpc.git next branch From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linuxppc-dev , Linux Kernel list Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:12:40 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1378434264.4321.209.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 10:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > > > * A bunch of endian fixes ! We don't have full LE support yet in that > > release but this contains a lot of fixes all over arch/powerpc to use the > > proper accessors, call the firmware with the right endian mode, etc... > > Ok, this caused a conflict in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c, where some > of the OF CPU number accessors had been moved to generic OF code > instead. Ah yes, sorry, I completely forgot to tell you about that ! (I was in a hurry to leave for the snow :-) > It *looks* to me like those accessors had already been made > endian-clean as part of the move to generic code, and so my conflict > resolution was to just ignore the parts of the changes the code that > no longer exists in prom.c, but you really should double-check my > resolution. Maybe I screwed it up. Ok, yes I had reviewed the new stuff and it should already be endian safe, so it should be all good, but I'll double check everything as soon as I'm back. > But apparent'y the LE mode isn't finished, so hopefully even if I read > those changes wrong it won't affect you guys too badly. I didn't > test-compile any of it, yadda yadda.. Yup, that's fine :-) We have a full LE tree internally of course but we are holding on some of the stuff until we decide what to do with the ABI (it would be nice to get rid of function descriptors for example) and fix some more bugs. So I decided to merge a batch of the "easy" stuff just to get it out of the way this time around, and hopefully the rest will be spread out across the next one or two merge windows. Cheers, Ben. > Linus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/