[PATCH 3/3] perf core: Fix a memory leak bug because symbol__delete is ignored

[Chenggang Qin <chenggang.qin@gmail.com>]

From: Chenggang Qin <chenggang.qcg@taobao.com>

In function symbols__fixup_duplicate(), while the duplicated symbols are found,
only the rb_node are deleted. The symbol structures themself are ignored.
Then, these memory areas are lost.
This patch fixed the bug. 
Thanks.

Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Chenggang Qin <chenggang.qcg@taobao.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

---
 tools/perf/util/symbol.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
index 9675866..3c9aa6f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
@@ -148,10 +148,12 @@ again:
 
 		if (choose_best_symbol(curr, next) == SYMBOL_A) {
 			rb_erase(&next->rb_node, symbols);
+			symbol__delete(next);
 			goto again;
 		} else {
 			nd = rb_next(&curr->rb_node);
 			rb_erase(&curr->rb_node, symbols);
+			symbol__delete(curr);
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
1.7.8.rc2.5.g815b