From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756148Ab3JXT7D (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:59:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:50685 "EHLO mail-ea0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755244Ab3JXT7A (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:59:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1382644733.19373.2.camel@lolumad> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: i.MX53: dts for Voipac x53-dmm-668 module From: Rostislav Lisovy To: Matt Sealey Cc: Shawn Guo , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sascha Hauer , pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:58:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1382461643-16790-1-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <1382461643-16790-4-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <20131023072738.GI2839@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1382641926.16515.2.camel@lolumad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I saw that most of the vendor prefixes are somehow shortened (e.g. Freescale -- fsl, etc.). Rostislav Lisovy On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 14:49 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > > Dear Shawn; > > Thank you for your comments. > > Should I also add Voipac to > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt? > > I would agree with that, but why is your chosen prefix "vp" instead of > "voipac" anyway? >