From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757424Ab3KHOxz (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:53:55 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:62143 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756953Ab3KHOxx (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:53:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1383922427.4964.123.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL = nogo From: Mike Galbraith To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , RT Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:53:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20131108142934.GA11112@localhost.localdomain> References: <1383228427.5272.36.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1383794799.5441.16.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1383798668.5441.25.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131108032343.GA18245@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1383895880.4964.91.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131108123713.GC18245@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1383917188.4964.94.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131108140331.GD18245@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20131108142934.GA11112@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:GO8w0ulLrP2+sMwaXBCSK6ZwAsMyt8ygN0wY+/JMRXw pGohJsE0M196AIW0gppyrXBmk6M5Fo1hF1rTg+qJLYS3tEXHV+ 6yyq43SUow167eA98UaP+JK5683mEV6H3r6ggWS31q2rgDnDJ2 fffvenMmteyDL/ghPrIauJl1tXNtLxNiBFm0AwSzGrpwWigF0l ZTcYOGx/2RSgavpvqdoSHnwAiNVrVnsle2w9u5ECvTPj3SjBMA lA7dv8AlXw91kdVBUnfJE9Xlnw9RbP5++PcBDqIAgw23LpI0gx L7f2sINSz+g4IGLVrHZGPjEhamYZOoZw2qQ08pnSSr546VSXFH 1jEjGeeFXNvf2puZvwQYDKyFfE/QLT5Am16K5Kx5E Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 15:29 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:03:31AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 04:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:31:20AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:23 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > An untested patch that gets rid of the RCU_SOFTIRQs in this case is below. > > > > > > > > > > Yup, toasted. > > > > > > > > You lost me on this one. If my patch broke your system, any chance of > > > > any diagnostic information? > > > > > > No no, the RCU_SOFTIRQs are toast, history, gone. > > > > Ah, I do like that outcome much better! ;-) The scheduling-clock > > interrupts are gone (or at least reduced) as well? > > > > And does this mean that I can have your Tested-by? > > What's wrong with Toasted-by: ? ;) It sprang to mind, but I resisted :)