linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Mark Harris <mhlk@osj.us>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] e2fsck: Correct ext4 dates generated by old kernels.
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:44:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384418641.1957.1.camel@chiang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <276FA06E-1EE0-4FB4-94E1-B6D9F05F0B5B@dilger.ca>

(apologies if this is a dup -- my mail client crashed and I don't see
this one in the lkml archives)
--
Older kernels on 64-bit machines would incorrectly encode pre-1970
ext4 dates as post-2311 dates.  Detect and correct this (assuming the
current date is before 2242).

Signed-off-by: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
---
 e2fsck/pass1.c   | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 e2fsck/problem.c |  4 ++++
 e2fsck/problem.h |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index ab23e42..b5ae885 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -348,6 +348,24 @@ fix:
 				EXT2_INODE_SIZE(sb), "pass1");
 }
 
+#define EXT4_EPOCH_BITS 2
+#define EXT4_EPOCH_MASK ((1 << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)
+
+static int check_inode_extra_negative_epoch(__u32 xtime, __u32 extra) {
+	return (xtime & (1 << 31)) != 0 &&
+		(extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK) == EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+}
+
+#define CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, xtime) \
+	check_inode_extra_negative_epoch(inode->i_##xtime, \
+					 inode->i_##xtime##_extra)
+
+/* When today's date is earlier than 2242, we assume that atimes,
+ * ctimes, and mtimes greater than 2242 are actually pre-1970 dates
+ * mis-encoded.
+ */
+#define EXT4_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_DATE_CUTOFF 5 * (1ULL << 32)
+
 static void check_inode_extra_space(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx)
 {
 	struct ext2_super_block *sb = ctx->fs->super;
@@ -388,6 +406,26 @@ static void check_inode_extra_space(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx)
 		/* it seems inode has an extended attribute(s) in body */
 		check_ea_in_inode(ctx, pctx);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If the inode's extended atime (ctime, mtime) is stored in
+	 * the old, invalid format, the inode is corrupt.
+	 */
+	if (sizeof(time_t) > 4 && ctx->now < EXT4_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_DATE_CUTOFF &&
+	    CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, atime) ||
+	    CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, ctime) ||
+	    CHECK_INODE_EXTRA_NEGATIVE_EPOCH(inode, mtime)) {
+
+		if (!fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE, pctx))
+			return;
+
+		inode->i_atime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+		inode->i_ctime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+		inode->i_mtime_extra &= ~EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+		e2fsck_write_inode_full(ctx, pctx->ino, pctx->inode,
+					EXT2_INODE_SIZE(sb), "pass1");
+	}
+
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 897693a..b212d00 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -1018,6 +1018,10 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
 	  N_("@i %i, end of extent exceeds allowed value\n\t(logical @b %c, physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
 	  PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
 
+  /* Timestamp(s) on inode beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 dates. */
+	{ PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE,
+		N_("Timestamp(s) on @i %i beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 dates.\n"),
+		PROMPT_FIX | PR_PREEN_OK | PR_NO_OK, 0 },
 
 	/* Pass 1b errors */
 
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index ae1ed26..3710638 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -593,6 +593,10 @@ struct problem_context {
 #define PR_1_EXTENT_INDEX_START_INVALID	0x01006D
 
 #define PR_1_EXTENT_END_OUT_OF_BOUNDS	0x01006E
+
+/* Timestamp(s) on inode beyond 2310-04-04 are likely pre-1970 dates. */
+#define PR_1_EA_TIME_OUT_OF_RANGE	0x01006F
+
 /*
  * Pass 1b errors
  */
-- 
1.8.1.2





  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-14  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-07  7:16 [PATCH] ext4: Fix reading of extended tv_sec (bug 23732) David Turner
2013-11-07 16:03 ` Jan Kara
2013-11-07 22:54   ` [PATCH v2] " David Turner
2013-11-07 23:14     ` Jan Kara
2013-11-07 23:26       ` [PATCH v3] " David Turner
2013-11-08  5:17         ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-08 21:37         ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-09  7:19           ` [PATCH] ext4: explain encoding of 34-bit a,c,mtime values David Turner
2013-11-09 23:51             ` Mark Harris
2013-11-10  7:56               ` David Turner
2013-11-12  0:30                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-12 21:35                   ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-13  7:00                     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec (bug 23732) David Turner
2013-11-13  8:19                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-11-13  7:00                     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] e2fsck: Correct ext4 dates generated by old kernels David Turner
2013-11-13  7:56                       ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-14  8:38                         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec (bug 23732) David Turner
2013-11-14  8:44                         ` David Turner [this message]
2013-11-14 10:15                           ` [PATCH v5 2/2] e2fsck: Correct ext4 dates generated by old kernels Mark Harris
2013-11-14 21:06                             ` [PATCH v6] " David Turner
2013-11-29 21:54                               ` David Turner
2013-11-29 22:11                                 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-12-07 20:02                                   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " David Turner
2013-12-07 22:33                                     ` Andreas Dilger
2013-12-08  0:53                                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-08  2:58                                       ` David Turner
2013-12-08  3:21                                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-07 20:02                                   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] debugfs: Decode {a,c,cr,m}time_extra fields in stat David Turner
2013-11-12 23:03                   ` [PATCH] ext4: explain encoding of 34-bit a,c,mtime values Darrick J. Wong
2013-11-13  2:36                     ` David Turner
2014-01-22  6:22                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-02-11  5:12                     ` David Turner
2014-02-11  7:07                       ` Andreas Dilger
2014-02-14  3:47                         ` [PATCH v8 1/2] ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec (bug 23732) David Turner
2014-02-14  3:47                         ` [PATCH v8 2/2] e2fsck: Correct ext4 dates generated by old kernels David Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384418641.1957.1.camel@chiang \
    --to=novalis@novalis.org \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhlk@osj.us \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).