From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753578AbaAQU0u (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:26:50 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:48392 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753332AbaAQU0q (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:26:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1389990392.10404.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support From: Johannes Berg To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Maxime Ripard , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:26:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1389941251-32692-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> References: <1389941251-32692-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:47 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > This patch series adds device tree support to rfkill-gpio, and > fixes some issues I ran into. This is so we can define and control > RF devices through the device tree, such as the Broadcom BCM20710 > UART-based Bluetooth device found on the CubieTruck, > Comments, please? Does anyone else want to maintain rfkill-gpio? :) I'm not up to par on all the DT, ACPI and even GPIO stuff it does, and the rfkill bits in it are really small ... I'll happily apply the patches if everyone else is happy with them, but please don't expect me to actually be able to say anything about them. johannes