From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752559AbaBCO5g (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 09:57:36 -0500 Received: from smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.1.5]:53795 "EHLO smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbaBCO5f (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 09:57:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1391439425.3509.16.camel@linaro1.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/16] ARM: Remove use of struct kprobe from generic probes code From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" To: David Long Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Oleg Nesterov , Anil S Keshavamurthy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , davem@davemloft.net, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:57:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1390507559-4697-8-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> References: <1390507559-4697-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> <1390507559-4697-8-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.122.217] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:05 -0500, David Long wrote: > From: "David A. Long" > > Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and architecture-specific > structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute > code being used only for uprobes or other non-kprobes instruction > interpretation. > > Signed-off-by: David A. Long > --- One minor nit-pick... [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c > index c7ee290..cea707a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c [...] > @@ -593,7 +590,7 @@ t16_emulate_pop_pc(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) > bx_write_pc(pc, regs); > } > > -static enum kprobe_insn __kprobes > +enum kprobe_insn __kprobes > t16_decode_pop(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi, > struct decode_header *d) > { The above removal of 'static' appears to be an unneeded accidental change? -- Tixy