From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932287AbaBGLuC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:50:02 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:41854 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753236AbaBGLuA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:50:00 -0500 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Joe Thornber , Mike Snitzer , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.11 097/233] dm space map common: make sure new space is used during extend Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:45:16 +0000 Message-Id: <1391773652-25214-98-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1391773652-25214-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1391773652-25214-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.11.10.4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Joe Thornber commit 12c91a5c2d2a8e8cc40a9552313e1e7b0a2d9ee3 upstream. When extending a low level space map we should update nr_blocks at the start so the new space is used for the index entries. Otherwise extend can fail, e.g.: sm_metadata_extend call sequence that fails: -> sm_ll_extend -> dm_tm_new_block -> dm_sm_new_block -> sm_bootstrap_new_block => returns -ENOSPC because smm->begin == smm->ll.nr_blocks Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c index 3e7a88d..0d24037 100644 --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_block_t extra_blocks) return -EINVAL; } + /* + * We need to set this before the dm_tm_new_block() call below. + */ + ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; for (i = old_blocks; i < blocks; i++) { struct dm_block *b; struct disk_index_entry idx; @@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_block_t extra_blocks) r = dm_tm_new_block(ll->tm, &dm_sm_bitmap_validator, &b); if (r < 0) return r; + idx.blocknr = cpu_to_le64(dm_block_location(b)); r = dm_tm_unlock(ll->tm, b); @@ -266,7 +271,6 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_block_t extra_blocks) return r; } - ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; return 0; } -- 1.8.3.2