From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933773AbaD3Oit (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:38:49 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:24206 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933648AbaD3Ois (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:38:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1398868713.24255.27.camel@hornet> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: vexpress: Convert custom func API to regmap From: Pawel Moll To: Lee Jones Cc: "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Rob Herring , Samuel Ortiz , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , David Woodhouse , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Mike Turquette Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:38:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140430142922.GU29462@lee--X1> References: <1398707877-22596-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1398707877-22596-3-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <20140430135855.GO29462@lee--X1> <1398867224.24255.22.camel@hornet> <20140430142922.GU29462@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:29 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > MFD diffstat looks great and the changes look sensible: > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones > > > > Thanks! > > > > > I guess someone will need to create a branch for us all to pull from. > > > I'm happy to do it if needs be. > > > > I was thinking that, with enough acks (and I'm counting on one from you > > for "[PATCH 04/10] mfd: vexpress: Define the device as MFD cells" :-), > > That won't happen right away - it's another 500+ line patch and > contary to popular believe I do have my own work to contend with too. Didn't expect it today :-) > > merging the whole series (or at least patches 1-4 and 7-8) through > > arm-soc tree would be the simplest option. I have no problem with the > > independent bits (clk, clocksource, hwmon and the mfd/HBI change) going > > through appropriate subsystems. > > I have no problem with that as long as one of the ARM-SoC guys can > provide a branch where the other subsystems can pull from. If they > have no time, my offer still stands. Appreciate this, thanks! Pawel