linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	1vier1@web.de, Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ipc/sem.c: remove code duplication
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:03:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399716199-26776-4-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399716199-26776-3-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com>

count_semzcnt and count_semncnt are more of less identical.
The patch creates a single function that either counts the number of tasks
waiting for zero or waiting due to a decrease operation.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index dc648f8..821aba7 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@
  *   Thus: Perfect SMP scaling between independent semaphore arrays.
  *         If multiple semaphores in one array are used, then cache line
  *         trashing on the semaphore array spinlock will limit the scaling.
- * - semncnt and semzcnt are calculated on demand in count_semncnt() and
- *   count_semzcnt()
+ * - semncnt and semzcnt are calculated on demand in count_semcnt()
  * - the task that performs a successful semop() scans the list of all
  *   sleeping tasks and completes any pending operations that can be fulfilled.
  *   Semaphores are actively given to waiting tasks (necessary for FIFO).
@@ -989,6 +988,31 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops, int nsop
 		set_semotime(sma, sops);
 }
 
+/*
+ * check_qop: Test how often a queued operation sleeps on the semaphore semnum
+ */
+static int check_qop(struct sem_array *sma, int semnum, struct sem_queue *q,
+			bool count_zero)
+{
+	struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
+	int nsops = q->nsops;
+	int i, semcnt;
+
+	semcnt = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++) {
+		if (sops[i].sem_num != semnum)
+			continue;
+		if (sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT)
+			continue;
+		if (count_zero && sops[i].sem_op == 0)
+			semcnt++;
+		if (!count_zero && sops[i].sem_op < 0)
+			semcnt++;
+	}
+	return semcnt;
+}
+
 /* The following counts are associated to each semaphore:
  *   semncnt        number of tasks waiting on semval being nonzero
  *   semzcnt        number of tasks waiting on semval being zero
@@ -998,66 +1022,39 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops, int nsop
  * The counts we return here are a rough approximation, but still
  * warrant that semncnt+semzcnt>0 if the task is on the pending queue.
  */
-static int count_semncnt(struct sem_array *sma, ushort semnum)
+static int count_semcnt(struct sem_array *sma, ushort semnum,
+			bool count_zero)
 {
-	int semncnt;
+	struct list_head *l;
 	struct sem_queue *q;
+	int semcnt;
 
-	semncnt = 0;
-	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_base[semnum].pending_alter, list) {
-		struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
-		BUG_ON(sops->sem_num != semnum);
-		if ((sops->sem_op < 0) && !(sops->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
-			semncnt++;
-	}
+	semcnt = 0;
+	/* First: check the simple operations. They are easy to evaluate */
+	if (count_zero)
+		l = &sma->sem_base[semnum].pending_const;
+	else
+		l = &sma->sem_base[semnum].pending_alter;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->pending_alter, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry(q, l, list) {
 		struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
-		int nsops = q->nsops;
-		int i;
-		for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
-			if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
-			    && (sops[i].sem_op < 0)
-			    && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
-				semncnt++;
-	}
-	return semncnt;
-}
 
-static int count_semzcnt(struct sem_array *sma, ushort semnum)
-{
-	int semzcnt;
-	struct sem_queue *q;
-
-	semzcnt = 0;
-	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_base[semnum].pending_const, list) {
-		struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
 		BUG_ON(sops->sem_num != semnum);
-		if ((sops->sem_op == 0) && !(sops->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
-			semzcnt++;
+		BUG_ON(sops->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT);
+		BUG_ON(sops->sem_op > 0);
+		semcnt++;
 	}
 
-	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->pending_const, list) {
-		struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
-		int nsops = q->nsops;
-		int i;
-		for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
-			if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
-			    && (sops[i].sem_op == 0)
-			    && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
-				semzcnt++;
-	}
+	/* Then: check the complex operations. */
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->pending_alter, list) {
-		struct sembuf *sops = q->sops;
-		int nsops = q->nsops;
-		int i;
-		for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
-			if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
-			    && (sops[i].sem_op == 0)
-			    && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
-				semzcnt++;
+		semcnt += check_qop(sma, semnum, q, count_zero);
+	}
+	if (count_zero) {
+		list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->pending_const, list) {
+			semcnt += check_qop(sma, semnum, q, count_zero);
+		}
 	}
-	return semzcnt;
+	return semcnt;
 }
 
 /* Free a semaphore set. freeary() is called with sem_ids.rwsem locked
@@ -1459,10 +1456,10 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
 		err = curr->sempid;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	case GETNCNT:
-		err = count_semncnt(sma, semnum);
+		err = count_semcnt(sma, semnum, 0);
 		goto out_unlock;
 	case GETZCNT:
-		err = count_semzcnt(sma, semnum);
+		err = count_semcnt(sma, semnum, 1);
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.0


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-10 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-10 10:03 [PATCH 0/6] ipc/sem.c: Fix semctl(,,{GETNCNT,GETZCNT}) Manfred Spraul
2014-05-10 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] ipc/sem.c: further whitespace cleanups Manfred Spraul
2014-05-10 10:03   ` [PATCH 2/6] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semctl(,,GETZCNT) Manfred Spraul
2014-05-10 10:03     ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2014-05-10 10:03       ` [PATCH 4/6] ipc/sem.c: Change perform_atomic_semop parameters Manfred Spraul
2014-05-10 10:03         ` [PATCH 5/6] ipc/sem.c: Store which operation blocks in perform_atomic_semop() Manfred Spraul
2014-05-10 10:03           ` [PATCH 6/6] ipc/sem.c: make semctl(,,{GETNCNT,GETZCNT}) standard compliant Manfred Spraul
2014-05-14 14:52             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-14 22:30               ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-15  4:24                 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-05-13  0:04         ` [PATCH 4/6] ipc/sem.c: Change perform_atomic_semop parameters Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12 18:19       ` [PATCH 3/6] ipc/sem.c: remove code duplication Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12 18:11     ` [PATCH 2/6] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semctl(,,GETZCNT) Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-13 17:43       ` Manfred Spraul
2014-05-11 23:34   ` [PATCH 1/6] ipc/sem.c: further whitespace cleanups Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12 17:50     ` Manfred Spraul
2014-05-12  2:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] ipc/sem.c: Fix semctl(,,{GETNCNT,GETZCNT}) Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12  8:02 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-12 17:43   ` Manfred Spraul
2014-05-18  7:58 Manfred Spraul
2014-05-18  7:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] ipc/sem.c: further whitespace cleanups Manfred Spraul
2014-05-18  7:58   ` [PATCH 2/6] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semctl(,,GETZCNT) Manfred Spraul
2014-05-18  7:58     ` [PATCH 3/6] ipc/sem.c: remove code duplication Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1399716199-26776-4-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=1vier1@web.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).