From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755556AbdCXH4f (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:56:35 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:33424 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751567AbdCXHze (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:55:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs To: Chen-Yu Tsai , Sebastian Reichel References: <20170320081653.8884-1-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170323093527.ojcdpvruzqnhvysq@earth> Cc: Mark Rutland , Thomas Petazzoni , devicetree , Lars-Peter Clausen , "open list:THERMAL" , Liam Breck , linux-sunxi , Russell King , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Rob Herring , Icenowy Zheng , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , knaack.h@gmx.de, Maxime Ripard , Lee Jones , Jonathan Cameron , linux-arm-kernel From: Quentin Schulz Message-ID: <13f2f8ba-af9e-576e-24ee-60c3a1609f80@free-electrons.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:55:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. >> >> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, >> as you will not end up with a long list. > > I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, > like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. > But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. > Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on his tree? Thanks in advance for clearing it up, Quentin -- Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com