From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751390AbcFXLih (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:38:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52717 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbcFXLig (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:38:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. To: Andreas Schwab , Andrew Pinski References: <1466485631-3532-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <1466485631-3532-2-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <5769139E.7020805@arm.com> <20160623043542.GA13449@yury-N73SV> Cc: Yury Norov , Szabolcs Nagy , GNU C Library , LKML , nd , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Marcus Shawcroft , philb@gnu.org, David Miller , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Joseph S. Myers" , Andrew Pinski From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <13f337ec-9ab8-9d7f-8984-0992ef73ddc7@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/23/2016 09:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Andrew Pinski writes: > >> So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles >> between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32 >> and LP64? > > Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is > aarch32 on aarch64? I also do not see sufficient justification for this ABI break. Thanks, Florian