From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932139AbaEaOql (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2014 10:46:41 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:13681 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752122AbaEaOqj (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2014 10:46:39 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,946,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="549387883" Message-ID: <1401547596.2426.4.camel@rzhang1-toshiba> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] ACPI enumeration rework (was: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] ACPI: ACPI enumeration rework) From: Zhang Rui To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@nebula.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 22:46:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: <35042328.kk6ZUUdfyN@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1400781753-2682-1-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com> <35042328.kk6ZUUdfyN@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 04:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, May 23, 2014 02:02:22 AM Zhang Rui wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > Currently, PNP bus is used as the default bus for for enumerating ACPI > > devices with _HID/_CID. > > For a device that needs to be enumerated to platform bus, we need to add > > its id string to the platform scan handler white list explicitly. > > > > This becomes a problem as more and more _HID devices need to be > > enumerated to platform bus nowadays, thus the list is continuously growing. > > > > So, a solution that uses platform bus for _HID enumeration by default > > is preferred. > > > > OK, this has had several rounds of review already and we're really starting > to run out of time with it, so my version of this patchset follows. > > It is mostly based on your patches, but reordered and with some major > changes. Compiled only for now, so please let me know if there's any > breakage in it. [The last patch will not apply without update of the > device list being removed, but generally this is on top of linux-next > material.] > Applied the patch set on top of linux-pm tree linux-next branch, with some modifications of Patch 9/10 because of the updated lpss id list, it works as expected on an IVB Ultrabook. Tested-by: Zhang Rui thanks, rui