linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
To: <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: <dvhart@infradead.org>, <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>,
	<luto@kernel.org>, <alex.hung@canonical.com>,
	<mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, <kernel@kempniu.pl>,
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/4] dell-wmi: Changes in WMI event code handling
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:20:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402523c32044788ab64db22d075fc83@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622103028.GB29844@pali>

> > I talked to the EC team about this a while back when it was first implemented.
> > That's not possible without _OSI detection of Linux.  _OSI detection
> > could be used to relay to the EC to behave differently, but otherwise
> > the EC will have no idea what OS it's on for which way to behave.
> 
> ACPI code should not behave differently for different operating systems.
> If there is bug in kernel, report bug to kernel, subtree maintainer for fixing it.
> And not doing workaround and hacks in ACPI.

This isn't ACPI code, this is EC code.

> 
> In this case there could be (standardized) ACPI function for turning off this
> nonsense functionality and supported kernel could call it.
> 

I think you might have interpreted my response differently than I intended.
I know that the Linux kernel has chosen to respond as the latest Windows
version for _OSI, and that's why it's not possible to do a different behavior
for Linux and Windows.

If there is a desire to go down the route of having different behavior for 
what the EC does in different OS'es, _OSI is only way to accomplish this.

> Is not there such ACPI function? Or Dell specific SMBIOS call?
> 

I'm not aware of any standard ACPI function or Dell function for this type 
of request.  Last time this was discussed I was told the EC would emit 
single display scan code for Windows < 7 (as Windows Vista and earlier
doesn't support super + p).  Windows > 7 (as detected  by _OSI and 
passed to EC) will emit super + p.

> > I don't remember all the history behind the switch over from a single
> > scan code To <super> + P, but I think it's along the lines of Windows
> > 8/Windows 10 allow you to iterate the display selection menu based
> > upon holding super and pressing P multiple times and waiting for you to stop.
> 
> Windows systems doing stupid things and fixing their bugs in ACPI is wrong. It
> broke for example this key on all other systems (Linux too).
> 

There's no bug in this behavior, it's intended behavior.

Like I said, previously display switch hotkey would immediately cycle outputs.
The behavior followed with super + p allows for OS to toggle through a menu
of outputs in this OS.

" Toggle through the projection mode (new with Windows 7)."
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms971323.aspx

> > Sending a single scan code will change displays immediately, so having
> > the EC send super+p unifies the behavior of fn-f8 and super+p.
> 
> And due to this OS/kernel cannot distinguish between Fn-F8 and Super+p keys...

Which is intended behavior from system designer's perspective.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15 19:49 [PATCH v3 0/4] dell-wmi: Changes in WMI event code handling Pali Rohár
2016-06-15 19:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dell-wmi: Ignore WMI event code 0xe045 Pali Rohár
2016-06-15 19:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dell-wmi: Sort WMI event codes and update comments Pali Rohár
2016-06-15 19:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event codes Pali Rohár
2016-06-15 19:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dell-wmi: Generate one sparse keymap for all machines Pali Rohár
2016-06-16  3:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] dell-wmi: Changes in WMI event code handling Darren Hart
2016-06-16  7:33   ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-16 23:01     ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-21 16:27     ` Darren Hart
2016-06-21 18:06     ` Darren Hart
2016-06-21 18:16       ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-21 18:29         ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-21 18:37           ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 10:30             ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-22 13:20               ` Mario_Limonciello [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402523c32044788ab64db22d075fc83@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM \
    --to=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=alex.hung@canonical.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).