From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5949FC5CFFE for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215FC2086D for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=openedev.com header.i=@openedev.com header.b="g0rKSNMi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 215FC2086D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=openedev.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727707AbeLKQgH (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:36:07 -0500 Received: from se15t.web-hosting.com ([162.255.118.154]:54101 "EHLO se15t.web-hosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726723AbeLKQgG (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:36:06 -0500 Received: from [68.65.123.203] (helo=server153.web-hosting.com) by se15.registrar-servers.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWl0j-0002FE-WC; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:36:02 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=openedev.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=45zotkRurVEs0HRhLtz1lXcKq9ANWXhV0XLWFrlcrc8=; b=g0rKSNMiRvKSn5/U5D5ajFSrc0 gbr96TDPM7iPCJ1u9PD8BFAocylf/JgLm+YnIDx1K9lzlrrZFTuUh2jXvmkQE+ShKlVfWwuiTknzb ZUnZnvmT13isTBVARcGJko7IgPlb2rB7kvwMXbnh8XvsVk2Ie4idgTG3XjRdiDWHeiExTZIMWmjhr BUY+EDn1jT/KC5WluenSlzmrX7IqRz3OePs3m2domlVLpzzJSxKoj6K3zPLVZtbSIuUZyOPLKDo51 OBM60cWFAbodk8572MMVuYT+yrsxfuPy9W98rVRw+GuAftPxwBGwDeTjKu3+NWWvK0X4DoGX3Hif2 TiJu7eCQ==; Received: from ip-160-131.sn-213-198.clouditalia.com ([213.198.160.131]:20839 helo=[192.168.1.101]) by server153.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gWl0f-001Nbr-E1; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:35:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v5 15/17] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI To: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, Jagan Teki Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Michael Trimarchi , linux-sunxi , linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com References: <20181210161729.29720-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181210161729.29720-16-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181211163222.hk647c24cjhmwrz4@flea> From: Jagan Teki Message-ID: <14061728-2ca3-3342-2cf3-b8588b112f5f@openedev.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:05:43 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181211163222.hk647c24cjhmwrz4@flea> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-Originating-IP: 68.65.123.203 X-SpamExperts-Domain: nctest.net X-SpamExperts-Username: whmcalls3 Authentication-Results: registrar-servers.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=whmcalls3@nctest.net X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.05) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5g7jWpq1/tr8K8nsIJt4IWV602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvO9dX4ZHi2KTdPJq2sFwGM16/7aw6ZDL6gCpHGlnjxa51P/a3oTZXMlz+UdhwK7oslF8p YZCrUbRX+v1BemLUP5r/e4EoE8VnbY0WmhMnUEcVsbramU7NHkOygsZkJKqgTTbvowDhMEK/yb1D YUdXtBiN7t7bU6UScO15SEoyP8zdZy+oxxLL6P2DauBVCvbXCWa1+/4Wol0EDMzOaSXdF5t+5q65 t/37jL/wD18gr271WPd9wMp2Wk7NNHZIu78v1X/EDCLJ+Ki55LYF4K/3JpM+Cg2CIV1xlqTHULpT 1Ej9/7vqxTzAaY6ctxp4g2WHgI8DORX/jSfD0m/fuegcItyS5zy3WPVfny99M+kdoq2BVFfcCf+U qoXy/yVRkHm4lwrApvGVmEId0tYoMZsYyYBvzxYv/Fi6Fp6VZudbG0yo9k0QcupFUVMVwNFDTBSb rgOdEYKItt9VZAAuHf7tOwyoYizzOVJd0iAs6zSf2DeeYMJ48uIpJwDb9Q3P/x52RQiigdwq0Z3p JL8LFIg0bRiTDIAeC1dmCNYjjD1RaEo1Z+IhnFL0+ulH7pLSIYfhSUWDCalQ5c9w96t6xs+MKalI PaEmzU9QjpeEAdtWMt9AqC1jWejFl/p4QDhGv5TXXFdAw+pKUNW1n03s4Dq5bQOkhUz6qAc3ygEG KiQdzbMc3V7AlQNPHuWfqqAYtP82P/YIREzoqsU/QPCJcf0TG0v7ZmVCeJKhFFHGf5MtKeejzTpc yXPDKzVOG3bU3Y8foVZA0RLR4+RHSH0VkFNYkHDfX8TdqEXkwxwMjsp2mNApUXV6QSAO+k9bjHri 1RsvOMXddNkPVNpiu/BnsT+7IHUgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4aTIX4MqJ00EpJRE4KKHUqeqbm1l8N Ay9hoSRG51DECq0h23Lg+9vjq7GGkzdFT+3Ipgmzm9xbfh6yfaz+azv0tqSWM6gxTWIh8fCWZqDe A9KU8AQyPXUCsQP+Lg2sdg3VbrDkkAqFYl3XQxhyXhqvd8MBD25g6jD/T4Cy9WwwbSDRAMTSSVAZ /Tfv9Po1e/xrDd9HEZlrzBTQx32xBEOTWqQS8bnXgaCDrwhWO8ymD52SFQ/uog93A6uWtOKD9McA zf0WufrmpmJq6mqrDZ69f2bjO41FyBEqIaDudcVplPHKi8lyfxjIq6n+5ncT+SkCz0gmOTRYyMZu ULKNmrPV+Zm9/b2E/M6OuIdx9tHWDo7x9CbKCImL6rLM1DNibzpj7eLLFnKm0ajcQdyvlVLHRzvq p4OMkG5MXg2Kgbo+SQTpaVgFKeINzqmqJKFRvnnmExxov/ex1D5pTgvUGv4wS8vPp594mStXk/Xx jWkCH0j2OKHH5lr9xXvSM4nM3avg X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se16.registrar-servers.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/12/18 10:02 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:47:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Minimum PLL used for MIPI is 500MHz, as per manual, but >> lowering the min rate by 300MHz can result proper working >> nkms divider with the help of desired dclock rate from >> panel driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki >> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd >> --- >> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c >> index 181b599dc163..b623c8150b4f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c >> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static struct ccu_nkm pll_mipi_clk = { >> .n = _SUNXI_CCU_MULT(8, 4), >> .k = _SUNXI_CCU_MULT_MIN(4, 2, 2), >> .m = _SUNXI_CCU_DIV(0, 4), >> + .min_rate = 300000000, /* Actual rate is 500MHz */ > > That comment still doesn't make any sense. Is it running at 500MHz or 300? It running in 300MHz, actual rate is 500MHz. > > Also, IIRC you had a patch adding support for maximum boundaries in > your previous patch, where did it go? Since I don't have any usecase to test I droped it. the same mentioned on the previous version.