From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264595AbTLEXbi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:31:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264600AbTLEXbh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:31:37 -0500 Received: from may.nosdns.com ([207.44.240.96]:44481 "EHLO may.nosdns.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264595AbTLEXbd (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:31:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:31:29 -0700 From: "Russell \"Elik\" Rademacher" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Business Reply-To: "Rusell \"Elik\" Rademacher" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <141103166375.20031205163129@webspires.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re[2]: HT apparently not detected properly on 2.4.23 In-Reply-To: <3FD114A5.5070100@stinkfoot.org> References: <20031203235837.GW8039@holomorphy.com> <20031205174850.GE8039@holomorphy.com> <17783749062.20031205110751@webspires.com> <3FD0CD65.5080307@stinkfoot.org> <86101410218.20031205160213@webspires.com> <3FD114A5.5070100@stinkfoot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - may.nosdns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - webspires.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Ethan, So noted. Thanks William for this. Now I have to resume patching the rest of 284 servers from various clients this weekend and have it all brought up to speed. Friday, December 5, 2003, 4:28:37 PM, you wrote: Ethan Weinstein> Russell "Elik" Rademacher wrote: >> Hello Ethan, >> >> Seems that patch of yours finally did the job of reporting it right >> this time around. I had to gank a few servers of different versions and >> giving the webhosting customers some little inconvience of downtime of 3 to >> 10 minutes for the linux recompile and reboot. And they all finally reports >> the number of processors correctly as it should be. >> >> Thanks Ethan. I going to put it on more servers that got those and >> see how they all go as well. As for the servers, they are all usually >> ServerWorks, Intel Chipsets of various types with Intel E1000, E100, Realtek >> network ports and with 3Ware or SCSI Adaptec adapters. Got about 80 of them >> in various types to go though, but 5 of them I that tested it on, it all >> reports correctly. >> >> Let see if the Dell servers also report the same as well when I get though with them tonight. >> Ethan Weinstein> Glad to help, but don't credit me with that Ethan Weinstein> patch, it was courtesy of Ethan Weinstein> William Irwin. Ethan Weinstein> -E -- Best regards, Russell "Elik" Rademacher Freelance Remote System Adminstrator/Tech Support