linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce task_rcu_dereference()
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:22:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414477378.8574.11.camel@tkhai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141027195446.GD11736@redhat.com>

В Пн, 27/10/2014 в 20:54 +0100, Oleg Nesterov пишет:
> task_struct is only protected by RCU if it was found on a RCU protected
> list (say, for_each_process() or find_task_by_vpid()).
> 
> And as Kirill pointed out rq->curr isn't protected by RCU, the scheduler
> drops the (potentially) last reference without RCU gp, this means that we
> need to fix the code which uses foreign_rq->curr under rcu_read_lock().
> 
> Add a new helper which can be used to dereferene rq->curr or any other
> pointer to task_struct assuming that it should be cleared or updated
> before the final put_task_struct(). It returns non-NULL only if this
> task can't go away before rcu_read_unlock().
> 
> Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
>  kernel/exit.c         |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 857ba40..0ba420e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2300,6 +2300,7 @@ extern void block_all_signals(int (*notifier)(void *priv), void *priv,
>  			      sigset_t *mask);
>  extern void unblock_all_signals(void);
>  extern void release_task(struct task_struct * p);
> +extern struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask);
>  extern int send_sig_info(int, struct siginfo *, struct task_struct *);
>  extern int force_sigsegv(int, struct task_struct *);
>  extern int force_sig_info(int, struct siginfo *, struct task_struct *);
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index 32c58f7..d8b95c2 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,55 @@ repeat:
>  		goto repeat;
>  }
>  
> +struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *task;
> +	struct sighand_struct *sighand;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We need to verify that release_task() was not called and thus
> +	 * delayed_put_task_struct() can't run and drop the last reference
> +	 * before rcu_read_unlock(). We check task->sighand != NULL, but
> +	 * we can read the already freed and reused memory.
> +	 */
> + retry:
> +	task = rcu_dereference(*ptask);
> +	if (!task)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	probe_slab_address(&task->sighand, sighand);
> +	/*
> +	 * Pairs with atomic_dec_and_test(usage) in put_task_struct(task).
> +	 * If this task was already freed we can not miss the preceding
> +	 * update of this pointer.
> +	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	if (unlikely(task != ACCESS_ONCE(*ptask)))
> +		goto retry;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Either this is the same task and we can trust sighand != NULL, or
> +	 * its memory was re-instantiated as another instance of task_struct.
> +	 * In the latter case the new task can not go away until another rcu
> +	 * gp pass, so the only problem is that sighand == NULL can be false
> +	 * positive but we can pretend we got this NULL before it was freed.
> +	 */
> +	if (sighand)
> +		return task;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We could even eliminate the false positive mentioned above:
> +	 *
> +	 *	probe_slab_address(&task->sighand, sighand);
> +	 *	if (sighand)
> +	 *		goto retry;
> +	 *
> +	 * if sighand != NULL because we read the freed memory we should
> +	 * see the new pointer, otherwise we will likely return this task.
> +	 */
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * This checks not only the pgrp, but falls back on the pid if no
>   * satisfactory pgrp is found. I dunno - gdb doesn't work correctly

Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22  7:17 [PATCH v4] sched/numa: fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign() Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-22 21:30 ` introduce task_rcu_dereference? Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-22 22:23   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-23 18:15     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-23  8:10   ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-23 18:18     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-24  7:51       ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-27 19:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] introduce task_rcu_dereference() Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-27 19:54   ` [PATCH 1/3] probe_kernel_address() can use __probe_kernel_read() Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-27 19:54   ` [PATCH 2/3] introduce probe_slab_address() Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-27 19:21     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-10-28  5:44     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-28  5:48       ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-28 15:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-28 17:56         ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-28 18:00           ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-28 19:55           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-28 20:12             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-29  5:10               ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-27 19:54   ` [PATCH 3/3] introduce task_rcu_dereference() Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-28  6:22     ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2016-05-18 17:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-18 18:23       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-18 19:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-18 19:57           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-26 11:34             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-03 10:49             ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use task_rcu_dereference() tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-03 10:48       ` [tip:sched/core] sched/api: Introduce task_rcu_dereference() and try_get_task_struct() tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-28 11:02 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign() tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-08  3:48 ` [PATCH v4] sched/numa: fix " Sasha Levin
2014-11-09 14:07   ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-10 10:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 15:48       ` Sasha Levin
2014-11-10 16:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-16  9:50       ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/numa: Avoid selecting oneself as swap target tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 16:03   ` [PATCH v4] sched/numa: fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign() Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 16:09     ` Sasha Levin
2014-11-10 16:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 16:10     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-10 16:36       ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-10 16:44         ` Sasha Levin
2014-11-10 20:01           ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-12  9:49             ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-15  2:38     ` Sasha Levin
2014-11-18 17:30       ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1414477378.8574.11.camel@tkhai \
    --to=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).