From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753217AbaKRAfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:35:36 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.12]:54158 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545AbaKRAff (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:35:35 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:968:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4321:5007:6119:6261:7576:8603:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: burn60_87cb55a9a511f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2188 Message-ID: <1416270932.29010.6.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/26 v5] seq_buf: Add seq_buf_can_fit() helper function From: Joe Perches To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Jiri Kosina , Petr Mladek Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:35:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20141117192733.0ab1ba2e@gandalf.local.home> References: <20141115045847.712848224@goodmis.org> <20141115050604.073390701@goodmis.org> <20141117123642.1de9252e@gandalf.local.home> <1416269253.29010.4.camel@perches.com> <20141117192733.0ab1ba2e@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 19:27 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:07:33 -0800 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 12:36 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:59:07 -0500 > > > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" > > > > > > > > Add a seq_buf_can_fit() helper function that removes the possible mistakes > > > > of comparing the seq_buf length plus added data compared to the size of > > > > the buffer. > > [] > > > > +static bool seq_buf_can_fit(struct seq_buf *s, size_t len) > > > > +{ > > > > + return s->len + len < s->size; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > Why is this useful? > > Places the logic in one place and makes the next patch much shorter. What "logic" does it place in one place and how does it matter? I don't see it making mistakes more or less likely, I just see it being used to avoid setting the overflow state which seems like more of an error than anything else. Why avoid setting overflow at all?