linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:52:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417434775.30245.29.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf26d39a4a251662dbc363092b319b788d223a7b.1416392687.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:31 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Remove legacy support for at91sam9rl boards.
> This include board files removal plus all legacy code for non DT boards
> support.
> Use the Device Tree for running this board with newer kernels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---

There's some further cleanup possible after this patch. I noticed that
when it landed in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141201) as commit
4403ac46edcd ("ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support").

>  arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263_defconfig   |  151 ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt        |   21 -
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile              |    4 -
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c         |  399 --------
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c | 1538 ------------------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c     |  493 ----------
>  6 files changed, 2606 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263_defconfig
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c
> 
>[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index cef0e2f57068..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
> +++ /dev/null
>[...]
> -/* --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - *  RTT
> - * -------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> -
> -static struct resource rtt0_resources[] = {
> -	{
> -		.start	= AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT0,
> -		.end	= AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT0 + SZ_16 - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	}, {
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	}, {
> -		.flags  = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> -	}
> -};
> -
> -static struct platform_device at91sam9263_rtt0_device = {
> -	.name		= "at91_rtt",
> -	.id		= 0,
> -	.resource	= rtt0_resources,
> -};
> -
> -static struct resource rtt1_resources[] = {
> -	{
> -		.start	= AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT1,
> -		.end	= AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT1 + SZ_16 - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	}, {
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	}, {
> -		.flags  = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> -	}
> -};
> -
> -static struct platform_device at91sam9263_rtt1_device = {
> -	.name		= "at91_rtt",
> -	.id		= 1,
> -	.resource	= rtt1_resources,
> -};
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
> -{
> -	struct platform_device *pdev;
> -	struct resource *r;
> -
> -	switch (CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT) {

This and...

> -	case 0:
> -		/*
> -		 * The second resource is needed only for the chosen RTT:
> -		 * GPBR will serve as the storage for RTC time offset
> -		 */
> -		at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 3;
> -		at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 1;
> -		pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt0_device;
> -		r = rtt0_resources;
> -		break;
> -	case 1:
> -		at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 1;
> -		at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 3;
> -		pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt1_device;
> -		r = rtt1_resources;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		pr_err("at91sam9263: only supports 2 RTT (%d)\n",
> -		       CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT);

this are the only places were the Kconfig symbol RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT
was used. It is useless now. That matches its help text, that reads:
    This option is only relevant for legacy board support and
    won't be used when booting a DT board.

> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	pdev->name = "rtc-at91sam9";
> -	r[1].start = AT91SAM9263_BASE_GPBR + 4 * CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_GPBR;
> -	r[1].end = r[1].start + 3;
> -	r[2].start = NR_IRQS_LEGACY + AT91_ID_SYS;
> -	r[2].end = NR_IRQS_LEGACY + AT91_ID_SYS;
> -}
> -#else
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
> -{
> -	/* Only one resource is needed: RTT not used as RTC */
> -	at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 1;
> -	at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 1;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
> -{
> -	at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
> -	platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt0_device);
> -	platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt1_device);
> -}

Is a patch to remove that symbol from drivers/rtc/Kconfig queued
somewhere?


Paul Bolle


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-19 10:31 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91sam9260/9g20 and at91sam9263 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:38   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 11:52   ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-12-01 16:09     ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-22  9:28       ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-22  9:45         ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-05 11:16           ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 11:55   ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-01 16:09     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove unused config options Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1417434775.30245.29.camel@x220 \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).