From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A4614A86 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="a4W3bM0D" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704209965; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LM7qdgWQDUzW1VNi9ViBduWaO+jG+K6dylQmR5RcPU8=; b=a4W3bM0DFkAStiDKqwbAPrfjsZiUdJvRKomek4I/FJbRWFAftovzOWWZT+pH3qUELg2TMx Yf49w0JwSkuyZVfb/Dk+eu/GOjU02z+ReSlAAv09ua/MKEiamMb1Bt4BmgJVmt16vxNJpQ mY+YZ3xSGmna91fkWHhmTCoWHOjWKG8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-483-bCb491KTO7inX5qiY8xZDw-1; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:39:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bCb491KTO7inX5qiY8xZDw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095318A0103; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB9C2166B31; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20231221132400.1601991-41-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20231221132400.1601991-41-dhowells@redhat.com> <20231221132400.1601991-1-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Schoenebeck , Jeff Layton , Matthew Wilcox , Christian Brauner , linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 40/40] 9p: Use netfslib read/write_iter Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <141744.1704209954.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:39:14 +0000 Message-ID: <141745.1704209954@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6 Hi Eric, Latchesar, Dominique, Would you have any chance to look at the 9p patch before the merge window opens? If not, what should I do with the patch? Should I keep it, or should I drop it for now and give it to you to take through the 9p tree if Linus accepts the rest of the patchset? Thanks, David