From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932504AbaLAU3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:29:20 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:60008 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932158AbaLAU3S (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:29:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1417465745.28610.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: net-PA Semi: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "pci_dev_put" From: Johannes Berg To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Lino Sanfilippo , Olof Johansson , netdev@vger.kernel.org, backports@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:29:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <547BC5AD.6090500@users.sourceforge.net> (sfid-20141201_023451_153915_6CFB474F) References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547A09B1.9090102@users.sourceforge.net> <547B579F.10709@gmx.de> <547BC5AD.6090500@users.sourceforge.net> (sfid-20141201_023451_153915_6CFB474F) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 02:34 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Some of those NULL pointer checks on input parameters may have been > > added subsequently to functions. So there may be older kernel versions > > out there in which those checks dont exists in some cases. If some of > > the now "cleaned up" code is backported to such a kernel chances are > > good that those missing checks are overseen. And then neither caller nor > > callee is doing the NULL pointer check. > I assume that a few backporters can tell you more about their corresponding > software development experiences. > http://www.do-not-panic.com/2014/04/automatic-linux-kernel-backporting-with-coccinelle.html In such cases we just provide an appropriate wrapper and replace callers of the original function by callers of the wrapper, typically with a #define. So this kind of evolution is no problem for the (automated) backports using the backports project - although it can be difficult to detect such a thing is needed. johannes